Kobolds with a keyboard.

  • 2 Posts
  • 442 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle






  • If a mass shooter kills a dozen people then gets shot and killed, people applaud the one who shot them.

    If a CEO directly contributes to the suffering and death of an untold number of people, then gets shot and killed, why should anyone respond differently?

    The fact that the deaths he caused were within the bounds of our legal system should be seen as a condemnation of our policies, not as justification for what he did. When other avenues have been exhausted, what did they think people were going to do - just sit around forever and say ‘Well, that sucks’?




  • They are responsible for their own problems that doesn’t mean I cheer for their falls.

    Being apathetic towards someone’s suffering doesn’t mean I’m cheering for it, that’s just psychopathic. However, I’m not going to lose any sleep worrying about your sister’s situation. If she needed help (and would accept it), that’d be different, but it sounds like she won’t. I’m sorry to hear about her situation, though.

    That said, if she was my sister, rather than a random stranger, I’d be a lot more invested, so I can empathize with your situation, wanting to help her but being unable to reasonably do so.

    I also won’t claim I don’t experience schadenfreude when I read an article about someone who (for instance) voted against their self-interests being negatively affected by the result of that action, but I’d still prefer that nobody was put into that situation in the first place.



  • I singled her out because she’s the easiest person to get stuck seeing on the front page, so it quite literally and unavoidably feels in your face, thus it’s a bit of a meme right now to cite her.

    I had to search for her to figure out who you meant; I’ve watched some of her content, but she’s nowhere near my front page. This is just the YouTube algorithm working against you. You can choose ‘Don’t recommend channel’ to avoid seeing her videos if you don’t want to.

    I feel like this comment of yours is a jab against me

    It’s not, I just assumed (apparently correctly) that you had a specific perspective since you called her (and only her) out by name.





  • I’d argue that the taxes are a separate cost, which would be paid separately rather than being included in the “purchase price” you’re using your dollar to offset. In OP’s example, the TV requires electricity to run, but the cost of that electricity is (presumably) not bundled into the purchase price. Just like maintenance on the house would not be included up front, as it’s a separate, additional cost.

    If you reject that, I’d argue that the land will exist well beyond the fall of civilization, and at some point, there won’t be a government to tax it. It will, however, still exist. If the land costs $400,000, and taxes are $10k / year, and we expect Earth to last about 8 billion years, and we expect government taxing the land to exist for, say, generously, 10,000 of those years, that’s only a net cost of $0.0125 per year. In this case, the land itself only costs $0.00005 per year, so you could buy quite a lot of things for your dollar, in fact.