Yeah, I think I’m good. Thanks, though. :)

After reading this and the replies, I am legitimately not sure if this is a joke or not. I’m not going to go try to find out, but if this is a joke, this is an absolute master class. Bravo.

I lowkey don’t think it looks bad. Clearly I have just as little fashion sense as he does.

I’d convert to Catholicism for him.

“I… declare… VICTORY!”

There’s a vampiric tutor face-up there; these are probably commander decks. Could easily be thousands per deck.

There’s also endless content of them confidently presenting these arguments to judges when they’ve broken laws and being immediately shut down by said judges.

Everyone who votes to go to war should be the first to get drafted.

Perhaps taking care of Clifford is what they do. The government just pays them to do it, and helps cover the costs, because the alternative is having Clifford rampaging around the city completely uncontrolled. They’re functionally zookeepers for kaiju.

That raises an interesting ethical concern. Should a 100’ tall woman have equal access to housing assistance? You could house hundreds of normal sized people for the same resources it would take to house her, but is she not deserving of the same benefits other people receive? Is it greatest good over equality?

Maybe that’s what he looks like when he’s been excessively drinking. I hear he does that.

There’s a surprising number of now-deceased Cybertruck owners who would still be alive if they’d had doors that open; that sounds like a pretty good value prop.

Neither. Clearly it’s a Magic Eye image.

What the fuck

Look who’s posting. Anyone who isn’t a literal communist is just too imperfect for them. Don’t you dare criticize Russia or China or North Korea, though.

It’s the ‘tan suit’ criticism with these people, just disregard them.

This sounds like the Train Simulator of driving games, which I’m sure there’s a market for. I think it could have more mass appeal without compromising the vision if you included a set of in-game goals like visiting various landmarks, obeying (or disobeying) road rules, or whatever else.

Depends on the conviction. If it was something that was settled in front of a judge with police as the primary witnesses, I probably wouldn’t care. If it was a serious crime decided by a jury, I’d give that a lot more weight.

This is likely more disruptive and annoying for the people working there, who then have to manually create a ticket and enter it into their ordering system, vs. an online order that does that automatically.

In the 90s? Sure.

“A man was murdered beside me during my meal.”

“It was you! You murdered your dining companion!”

“That doesn’t change the facts.”