Fuck these people. They’re literally just disregarding voter passed measures. If they can pass that measure I hope they kick his ass out next chance.
Fuck these people. They’re literally just disregarding voter passed measures. If they can pass that measure I hope they kick his ass out next chance.
Might be hard to keep a person on the tiny thing, but they probably uploaded the proof of their law breaking there thinking it’d be safe in space.
Colorado ruled that he was ineligible due to having participated in the insurrection, and then the USSC ruled that nothing prevents him from running, only holding office, so they had to keep him on the ballot.
They didn’t actually say he can hold office, but they basically punted it to congress to declare that he can’t, and would need to perform a vote to allow him to hold office.
But Congress won’t do their duty, and the current house would majority vote to allow him to run because it’s fully of corrupt.
Bitcoin was the very first solution to how do you prevent a digital item from being copied and used repeatedly aka double spending.
Nothing digital was truly safe from this until bitcoin as you always had to trust someone who could double spend or steal it if they wanted to, or the database/system being hacked and things altered.
Things became truly immutable once committed to the chain.
The whole system needed an incentive to keep everyone aligned to reject double spends, and the coin itself was the reward. (Edit and there’s a limited number of coins, making them scarce)
Miners get rewarded for ensuring transactions are legitimate. It costs money to gain the reward so it’s better for them to just keep the reward instead of risking losing it
Edit: it also created the first time we could prove something digital existed at a point in time. Everything before this involved trusting someone data wasn’t altered to ‘prove’ it. Since blocks are immutable, their timestamp proves something existed then. E.g. a hash of a picture. It’s irrefutable the picture existed on that day.
Other billionaires also have security. The accused people who aren’t really Satoshi likely don’t have the means to properly protect themselves the same way.
Over here in Victoria, people have been complaining non stop since the start of putting in protected bike lanes. We have a really good connected network now, but at the start when the first lane went in, there was such an uproar about this useless short lane that went nowhere before the network had even been built. It was pretty amusing to watch the idiots speak out like that about the short lane.
It tastes good, but i feel pretty guilty doing it
I don’t do it often, but pasta with a cream of mushroom or clam chowder soup.
Maybe not too weird, but that’s probably as weird as it gets.
The judge’s response was that not releasing it simply because it might affect the election would itself represent interference by the court.
Delaying/hiding important information interfering with an election? Who would have thought! Oh wait wasn’t he also convicted in civil court for… paying to hide information and trying to cover it up?
Clearly he knows the importance of information and how it can interfere with an election including not releases it.
The problem was how you refilled it. If it had a different refilling mechanism that could be done safely, even if lit, it’d probably be okay.
We light things on fire ontop of other things all the time.
edit: Oh and some form of indicator if there’s still a fire, given the invisible flames. Even though the issues were with refilling, you know someone will eventually still put their hand over/into it.
There were some patent fights involved that resulted in features being altered.
That cant explain it all though.
Just any voice assistant in the kitchen to set cooking timers.
Jeff Bezos and his massive overcompensation of a dick rocket that can also land propulsively, but not worth discussing.
In case anyone doesn’t know why… it’s not an orbital rocket. It just goes up and down. Orbital is going up AND sideways very fast.
I tried to explain to someone months ago that SpaceX testing things to failure was part of their success, and gave an example like purposely leaving heat shield tiles off starship to see what happened, or launching a version of starship that didn’t have all the improvements that the next starship had, and they then came back saying that is exactly why they (and other people) hate SpaceX. They don’t know everything up front and they should!
I thought it was the boosters that were in retrospect pointlessly refurbished and would have been cheaper to make new.
Are you sure it was also the shuttle itself being cheaper to make new? The shuttle also took something like 6 months to refurb. Reusable, but not rapid.
President tries to kill VP during Jan 6th
VP decides to kill President first.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but FSD isn’t available in France.
two-seater, sporty coupe - quite the opposite of a typical taxi with room for several passengers and luggage - flummoxed investors and analysts.
The majority of rides are 1 or 2 people.
For when there’s more than 1 or 2 people… they have the model 3, and Y.
It’s not rocket science people.
But his other company did just catch a rocket between two giant chopsticks.
It’s been 1 year away every year, not 2
deleted by creator