Was Spez the one backing crypto? I thought that was Alex Ohanian the other living founder.

Literally the top choice for beater chefs knife in kits around the world. My Henkles and Globals are nice knives but if Im splitting up a partly frozen whole chicken Im using the victorinox because it is made to be abused

Unfortunately I already have been assaulted

Read the link as it does in fact discuss this. I did supply evidence you just haven’t read it.

It’s in the link I supplied. They talk about how it went from twenty nine years old to seventy from 1930 to now. You want to guess what the biggest change was for Inuit in that time?

The fact that the brain needs glucose means your brain does need carbs. You might not need to eat carbs to get that glucose but that’s different.

The fact is we have no idea how healthy or unhealthy a keto diet is long term for people with “normal” digestion.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm

Source on premodern Inuits living substantially shorter lifespans

Obviously I can’t source a negative that there aren’t dietary studies on people with “normal” digestion doing keto for decades. You can try finding them and discovering no e have been done on your own.

Fun fact they talk about pre-modern Inuit diets in your link but completely avoid the fact the Inuit died of natural causes substantially earlier than almost all cultures. It’s weird how often those pushing keto reference the Inuit but avoid that bit. Modernity has changed this significantly so modern Inuit have similar lifespans to other people.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm

That’s because they aren’t what I asked for though to be fair Im also aware those sources do not exist because we haven’t done those studies.

The fact that the Inuit traditionally have a much shorter lifespan is a fairly well documented fact. It’s really hard living in the Arctic and it is extremely likely that you do need some plants to live a more normal life. You’ll note it’s never academics that bring them up as an example for how keto is “totes healthy” (again we don’t know if it is for decades on end).

Yes but the fix for that specific issue is fat not veggies

I asked for academic sources for a reason nakely because there is a ton of bullshit broscience surrounding keto. Do you have peer reviewed academic sources? Wikipedia and a pharmacy group’s blog aren’t peer reviewed academic sources.

As an aside you might want to look into how much younger Inuits who ate a traditional diet died vs those that ate more plants. It doesn’t support keto as a healthy diet at all by comparison.

Rabbit poisoning is too much protein and not enough fat.

Academic peer reviewed source supporting your claim that your body runs better on fat please?

Academic source that proves humans can live healthy lives without carbs? Keep in mind no studies have been done on ketogenic diets in people with “normal” digestive systems that have spanned decades.

I suspect you are going to have to dial that claim back a bit. At best right now it appears as if it might be possible for adults to avoid carbs but we have no idea what that looks like over the course of a full life nor is anyone going to run this test on kids.

Who disputes the need for some carbohydrates? Our brains run on carbs.

When the firstHarry Potter movie came out the “flying” effect on the broom was just vibration. The reviews for it were incredible. “My six year old loves it but her twelve year old sister can’t be separated from it. I had to get another one for my 17 year old daughter as well!”

Their reply to my joke was instructing me to talk to the women in my life about assault when not only women are victims.

Regardless joke police can go to a dark corner never to return.

The presumption that only women can be the victims of assault.

First many people who aren’t women are sexually assaulted. Im one of them. Fuck your sexism, no seriously fuck your sexism.

Second the humor here is based on the bad title writing not the sexual assault. If the word “groped” was replaced by “robbed” the source of humor would be the exact same thing, namely that the headline suggests the airline was involved in said crimes.

Finally the world is a hard place already. Do you need to go around policing other’s humor? If so why and who gave you the right to determine what is acceptable?

You don’t need to reply because Im blocking you as you clearly aren’t someone with anything to offer.

In conclusion fuck your sexism.

Why would the teens want the airlines to help grope them?