Trump v. United States

https://archive.org/details/CSPAN_20240428_171000_Supreme_Court_Hears_Case_on_Fmr._Pres._Trumps_Immunity_Claim/start/3960/end/4020

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2023/23-939_f2qg.pdf

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Well, that’s what I – I mean, shortly after that statement in the court, that – court’s opinion, that’s what they said, but there’s no reason to worry because the prosecutor will act in good faith and there’s no reason to worry because a grand jury will have returned the indictment. Now you know how easy it is in many cases for a prosecutor to get a grand jury to bring an indictment, and reliance on the faith – good faith of the prosecutor may not be enough in the – some cases. I’m not suggesting here.

Votes are public to not just to the original instance admins though but to any instance admin, right? If you setup your own instance and federate with another, then you should be able to view the votes for any communities on the one you federate with. The only privacy is that the default UI doesn’t display it, but a different UI could:

e.g. the one for this post on kbin.social that shows Lemmy upvotes as favorites.

I feel like this should be more prominently disclosed to Lemmy users.

More specifically:

The each state gets two seats in the senate, no matter how many people in it. In the house of representatives, each state gets a proportional number based on population, with a minimum of one, and those districts should have a roughly equal population within each state. Due to the cap on representatives and the minimum of one though, it can end up with an uneven number of people represented by each elected official when you compare between states.

If they control the legislature of the state though, they can also control the redistricting process that decides where the boundaries are for the federal house of representative districts and thus can gerrymander things. See this for an explanation of how one can produce districts that don’t resemble the underlying population: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering

The fact that that needs to have disambiguation parentheses is even worse: it means there’s more than one statue.

I don’t think there’s a lack of empathy, especially when you consider that we may be concerned for the more numerous viewers who could potentially see your comments if we help you bypass the filters that you seem to be running into more than just occasionally.

It’s not that they need to know that to provide a potential answer, it’s that they want to know that before they decide to help you bypass a filter.

I’m pretty sure people are focused on what the content is because they have reservations about helping someone bypass filters to post stuff that may be offensive enough to be deleted in the first place.

Get the error:

Error: temporarily_disabled

Vizio makes twice as much profit from those ads and tracking services than the actual TVs:

https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/10/22773073/vizio-acr-advertising-inscape-data-privacy-q3-2021

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&userId=458302

reason: article date is older than 14 days

reason: not recent (over 14 days)

I’m assuming those are the posts. For some reason they don’t show up at the world news specific log:

https://lemmy.world/modlog/1322?page=1&actionType=All&userId=458302

Looks like it just concatenates them:

The shared secret is calculated as the concatenation of the X25519 shared secret (32 bytes) and the Kyber768Draft00 shared secret (32 bytes). The resulting shared secret value is 64 bytes in length.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00-02.html>

Yeah, I feel like it’s going to take both browser vendors shaming sites once a standard is developed/finalized and something like a quantum version of whynohttps.com to drive adoption.

The problem really is the store and decrypt nature of it. It could be used against old data so the time when it needs to be implemented is before it becomes possible to decrypt. I feel like people aren’t good about planning like that and tend to be more reacting to what is currently possible.

Considering this proposal is used for the key exchange, they definitely need to update both the client side and server side part to be able to make use of it. That’s the kind of thing that may take years but luckily it can fall back to older methods.

It also needs to be thoroughly vetted so that’s why it’s a hybrid approach. If the quantum resistant algorithm turns out to have problems (like some others have), they’re still protected by the traditional part like they would have been, with no leaking of all the data.

Currently being investigated by browser makers but not something they can just do on their own like Signal.

Here’s Chromium’s current proposal that they’re testing:

https://blog.chromium.org/2023/08/protecting-chrome-traffic-with-hybrid.html

Is it set to just unspecified? You can select more than one language (or all of them). I’m thinking you might not have English selected.

Can you see my other comment replying to your comment in this post?

It looks like on the post you originally referenced there are 4 with language unspecified and the rest are all tagged as English.

Are you able to see this post?

The law can come into effect whenever they want it to and the sites need to have their filtering systems ready and tested before that happens for them to be effective:

https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2023/08/the-bill-c-18-regulation-fake-out-setting-the-record-straight-on-when-bill-c-18-takes-effect-and-the-regulation-making-process/

Is monetization required for a site to qualify as a digital news intermediary though? It seems like there just needs to be an imbalance:

https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-18/royal-assent

Application 6 This Act applies in respect of a digital news intermediary if, having regard to the following factors, there is a significant bargaining power imbalance between its operator and news businesses:

(a) the size of the intermediary or the operator;

(b) whether the market for the intermediary gives the operator a strategic advantage over news businesses; and

(c) whether the intermediary occupies a prominent market position.

What happens when a Lemmy instance gets too big?