deleted by creator

Isn’t Dishonored somewhat of a spiritual successor?

Starmer is utterly terrified of getting painted with the anti-semitism brush, and is massively overcompensating as a result

They’re making him a lord

Worse, Cameron

For me personally, the answer to the original question would be “only once no other non-violent means are available”.

Does this resonate, or would you consider it different to your perspective? I see them as similar.

Surely protecting is by definition preemptive since it means you are not allowing the violence against yourself or someone else to occur? Not saying your first point is wrong just doesn’t seem consistent to me.

Only revenge/retribution would not be preemptive which imo is not better.

Not a fan of the framing here, ‘were’ vs ‘would be’ as if the later is just a hypothetical rather than the reality of civilians in Gaza.

Highly recommend the podcast ‘It’s probably not aliens’ if you want to find out more about the real history of the claims made in these kind of shows, and how the claims of aliens are often rooted in racism and colonialism

Deliberately trying to burn the house down on the way out more likely

Monetization: Providing a way for people to pay for something they want

Exploitation: Making people pay outside their means for something they need, or feel like they need (usually bc of FOMO)

Ah so the prime minister had the pass code to his official government phone just written down somewhere… That’s great sounds secure to me, carry on