You know Carney’s Liberal are conservative in red coat when they accused the Liberal for the Ontario Forest fires

Thanks. I found this Telegraph article too

https://archive.vn/lmy5W

Don’t know the guy. Someone could fill me in on why he was sacked?

I prefer the comic

Yes but the driving force for the narration is « how people without powers will react to people with power » but yes it’s not all non-power characters

The first season is more about the effects of super power on normal people lives and they react about it … after that there’s a lot of power that are thrown around

What you’re searching have been done in comics but not a lot in TV or movie IIRC

Maybe I’m old but I was thinking the old one

Edit : my argument is being moot since there’s the New York skyline on the poster of the second movie 🤣

Is not always New York, Marvel puts its movies in New York as a form of running gag. Their first office was there.

Superman movie are more in California.

The Boys ?

Don’t mess with my pinte

Sorry man.

A quick search in Google Scholar doesn’t reveal a China expert named Charles Burton

His book (the beaver and the dragon) seems to be Amazon self published and was out only since 2025

I only found his name in dubious editorial site

So yeah this guy seems at best a hack, at worst on the payroll of some American think tank

Sure. But most of the Canadian diplomat in China have a Wikipedia page and he doesn’t. Also if you say « I’m a an ex diplomat in China » I’ll respond with « cool show me your credentials »

This guy is nowhere to be found and it’s normal in day and age that we ask for proof

Didn’t he promise to make the Tesla patent public and when it did they were decades old already public patents or a shit like that ?

I think that the main NSFW instance have been defederated by a bunch of instances for publishing pedophilic content. So yeah you have to open an account on this instance since it’s alone in the sea

As I understand it : no

And all my dogs come to the yard

My point being that this Charles Burton seems to come from nowhere and don’t seems to have any history other than being the Burton’s Report’s author (which is itself a little thin)

And since most of the article you post is based on the authority and credibility of the author its seems (to me at least) that this guy doesn’t have any

I find incredibly suspicious that this guy is only mentioned two times in the Wikipedia on Canada-China relation(I think it’s this one so far I’m unable to link the aryicle) and don’t seems to have a Wikipedia page in English only in French (which is less than 10 line)

In 2005, Charles Burton, an associate professor at [Brock University]Burton’s report, commissioned by the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs, was entitled *Assessment of the Canada-China Bilateral Human Rights Dialogueand released in an unclassified public version in April 2006. As revealed by [leaked US diplomatic cables], the “Burton Report” considerably affected Western policy approaches to engagement with China on human rights[[25]]

Each link (with the exception of the one of Brock University) go back to the article on China-Canada Relations, in short it’s cited itself so I clear them

In the first year of his prime ministership, Trudeau’s government agreed to talks on a bilateral [extradition treaty] with China in 2016.[[38]] Former diplomat [Charles Burton], presented as a critic of the government policy as the treaty talks were revealed, said in a New York Timesaccount:[[38]]

We don’t seem to have the linguistic and cultural expertise and political knowledge to defend our interests against a very sophisticated diplomatic engagement by China, which seems to always come out on top.

Once again each link (with the exception of extradition which go back to extradition) link to the article

I’ll search for that « Burton’s Report » (which is 11 pages long and don’t seems that important to judge international politics)

Final edit & my conclusion : Globe&Mail have a tendency to fall in obvious pitfalls and I think this is one. They fall so hard that in one piece they defend the Falung Gun and their spectacle. China is major player and we should fear them and be ready but it seems to me that the Globe&Mail is a source that we shouldn’t trust

https://archive.vn/BxbUM

Debbie McWilliams, who cast the previous 14 Bond films, said Ian Fleming “wrote a character, and that’s the character that stays”.

IIRC bond don’t look like Connery and he have a scar … so she failed right off the bat

Also this article is shit on paper. 4/5 are a nothing piece about MGM searching a new Bond and being acquired by Amazon

AI manager