Is this post about Github seemingly detecting an incorrect licence? The project was relicenced in a later commit, so I dont think this behavior is entirely wrong.
Is this post about Github seemingly detecting an incorrect licence? The project was relicenced in a later commit, so I dont think this behavior is entirely wrong.
deleted by creator
The drive with the game files is mounted.
Where is it mounted? Try navigating to that mountpoint, not to the device itself.
I so want this to be true, but dont they produce radio waves?
Im not aware of any. Most clones have a very different architecture (and programming language, most clones dont run on the JVM) than Minecraft, even tho some projects go for feature parity and support the original Minecraft multiplayer protocol.
So, no licencing problem Im aware of, mods are free to be shared under whatever licence and many are FOSS, but a technical problem.
Cant they? Sure, they would have to make up new users instead of simply saying a number, but what is actually preventing that?
What should it do instead? I think the only reasonable action would be not showing it if the licence file was changed.