Twenty years ago when I was 13, I started doing web stuff. This was back when everything was super simple, so everything to get a webserver up was super manual. I’ll mention port forwarding at my current job and there’s this slice of people that are 28-40 years old that know what I’m talking about.
Catch maybe
Super strange that a corporation can successfully be remunerated for a change in policy, when the policy is question is hard reduction for a concept that Exxon has been aware of for 50 years
They claim that the government under former prime minister Mark Rutte took “unilateral measures that arbitrarily disadvantaged ExxonMobil as an investor” — they closed the gas field, and we don’t get to make money anymore.
Seems like if Exxon is going to talk out of both sides of their mouth, they should be sanctioned for misleading investors about the risks of their products.
Aside from the veganism/ antiveganism circlejerks, aren’t animals that are raised in a more healthy way more tasty? And aren’t injured and dead animals not consumed, therefore wasted and contributing to emissions despite not returning nutritional value?
Scaling down to more humane conditions is good for everybody.
Edit supposition corrected
Yeah, it’s not clear if they were the court appointed psychiatrist and if they assembled a report like the law requires. If they did, and the judge ignored it and their testimony he’s being a shitbird.
No, I want to have patients assessed for release like the law requires and actually have the system do something more than abuse people.
Right, it’s obvious that it’s horrible, it’s tone deaf to harp on it when she’s been incarcerated for a decade.
Well it’s the fact that she did this as an untreated mentally ill 12 year old, and now they have a decade of treatment under their belt. The request actually contains a request to be assessed by an expert.
The one-page petition doesn’t include any arguments for Geyser’s release. Instead, it cites state laws that require Bohren within 20 days to appoint at least one expert to examine her and produce a report within 30 days of being appointed.
If she hasn’t been assessed there’s no reason not to assess her now that she’s requested it.
When you fail a few times, you lower your standards and boom
Yakuza.
Ok so BP is going to declare bankruptcy and liquidate, and all these cockroaches will scatter into the shadows instead of being held accountable…
I don’t think you are paying attention to the impacts of different things, or who benefits from the paradigms that are perpetuated.
Did you consider for any amount of time who benefits from strict gender divides in general?
Nah you are good.
The thing about this is that men are provided more space for essentials in the workplace, and making men stand to piss means less physically abled people have more trouble operating in that workplace.
So outside the gender ick issues there’s equality reasons that gender neutral toilets are a good thing.
Explain the scare quotes.
Yeah. All private ones are already.
Nothing.
Nothing is good enough. Gendered bathrooms are about repression. That’s why they are so mad about non-gendered toilets that are popping up.
I wonder if they can send a representative and make a motion to dismiss it.
I gotta say, because of the nature of systemic racism turns of phrase that are ambiguous or are explicitly neutral can be prejudiced or discriminatory is different ways.
We can’t rely on a statistical model to tell us what is infringing on right. We have to be critical.