

There is no paradox. If you don’t tolerate people you are not covered by tolerance.
There is no paradox. If you don’t tolerate people you are not covered by tolerance.
Maybe they should split the design and the manufacturing. Everyone can throw a design to the table and then choose the best. And then and only then talk about which part is build by which partner.
“Unprecedented force”? Are they gonna nuke Gaza? 'Cause they have thrown everything else there.
That could work of nobody knew it was changing to another hands. But once everybody knows it’s not the same, people flee.
“I understood that reference!”
“I’m as mad as hell and I’m not gonna take it anymore!”
Now imagine if the ones doing this were RDJ and Tom Holland.
Everyone, remember: Marvel, Alien and Star Wars are also Disney.
But the replacement parts can be a real problem.
Not the villains. But they should do what they need to do to balance the play field.
Without the “pro”
Maybe that’s the joke.
They should talk ABOUT Trump but without Trump.
Parliament
Crematorio
El Ministerio del Tiempo
I’d be a watchdog, not a dictator. I think that’s the better use of that power. And if I had an idea then I’d take it to the same process as the rest of the laws and have a vote on it.
The correct answer to that, after the Israhell bombing, should be a friendly and happy “go fuck yourself”.
There is a way… but it won’t happen: block Starlink and X in Europe. And ban Tesla too.
And ogg?
The boss is never a real friend.
The paradox only happens because tolerance is taken as an absolute. But if it’s a contract there is no paradox.
But thanks for the advice.