You think giving away ChatGPT for free isn’t distorting a market ?

Or common clients like voyager need it. should be doable. Would sell me on a client instantly

Hexbear neonazi tankies one one side, overbearing blocking on the other.

it’s facebook….

You don’t show full posts because then your team gets to count an ‘active’ user when people click to expand.

Metrics becoming the goal 101 and active user growth is important to get investors to hold the bag for your VCs. Every action right now, that the VC money is getting scarce is aimed at making Reddit look like a profitable target for street investors so your VCs can cash out. Doesn’t matter if what you do isn’t sustainable, because you are the VCs bitch now and they want their payout before you crash and burn.

That may have been their plan, but Meta fucked them from behind and released LLama which now runs on local machines, up to 30B parameter size and by end of the year will run at better than GPt3.5 ability on an iphone.

Local llms, like airoboros, WizardLm, Stable Vicuña or Stable Coder are real alternatives in many domains.

Nothing to do with AI, Garbage in, Garbage out.

LLMs are tools that satisfies requests. The developer decided to allow people to put the ingredients for chlorine Gas into the input - LLM never stood a chance but to comply with the instructions to combine them into the end product.

Clear indication we are in the magical witch hunt phase of the hype cycle where people expect the technology to have magical induction capabilities.

We could discuss liability for the developer but somehow I don’t think a judge would react favorably to “So you put razor blades into your bread mixer and want to sue the developer because they allowed you to put razor blades into the bread mixer”

It’s a bullshit article by a bullshit website. The law in question is a decade old. Japan hasn’t decided anything - they are slow to decide new things. It’s just this page clickbaiting.

I mean the way Alberta votes and squanders its oil wealth is really dumb