It’s less of a “dice jail” and more so a “dice oubliette”.
It’s less of a “dice jail” and more so a “dice oubliette”.
Calling out usernames is so damn annoying. At best it’s a distraction from the content, particularly if it’s a serious story like this one. At worst it encourages other idiots to come up with the most obnoxious name they can so they can garner attention.
It’s a study by a US organization. Why would it have access to information about Canadian territory? Also…what does an open border have to do with anything? Do you expect either country to be able to block those sorts of things?
This is a good recommendation. I went into the movie thinking it would be silent. Was kind of disappointed that it wasn’t, tbh.
Imo, Azula was the most consistently creative. They really did a good job depicting her as the savant she was supposed to be. Like in the examples you chose, using fire as a shield is much more unique than any of the others.
Fucking Bucky Barnes is playing Trump? Never would’ve expected that in a million years. This timeline is bizzaro.
Maybe, hah, probably not to the god of catholics, though.
There are the BIG casinos, which only take up a finite space, but there are also little casinos pretty much everywhere you look. Even gas stations will have slot machines. That’s true of most of nevada, tbh.
Dammit. Got too hung up on scoffing at the ‘more churches than casinos’ line to even expect the pun setup.
All of that also being known as…normalization.
To be clear, it’s never warranted. It’s just some cultures that have normalized the practice for certain services. Companies should always fully pay their employees. Full stop.
The Twitter Watches Alex Tonight Show.
They absolutely do exist. The GOP built their base on cobbling those voters together into one force. As long as they make empty gestures to their variety of issues, their SIVs keep in line no matter what other horrid shit they do. It’s taken a much more sinister bent, lately, but the core is still there.
Dems have the reverse issue - voters declaring they won’t support them if they don’t address one issue, with the biggest and latest being the invasion of Palestine. There are absolutely voters out there that will ignore the rest of the good things done by their candidate, or worse, ignore how things will just get worse without them, all because of one little grievance. Dems have always had a bit of a purity test problem, but it’s multiplied into a much bigger problem this cycle.
And all this said, I’m not dismissing your point that division is a serious issue, but not working together because of these singular issues is a big part of the problem.
You’re either misinterpreting the criticism or talking to people that don’t know wtf they’re talking about. Neither mean single issue dems aren’t a problem.
I didn’t ask the question. Just here to point out your 43% “answer”.
16 ≠ 37. You’re missing over half the list.
https://files.catbox.moe/odekq1.jpg