- 98 Posts
- 228 Comments
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Privacy Guides@lemmy.one•The 200+ Sites an ICE Surveillance Contractor is Monitoring | ShadowDragon sources data from all over the web and lets government analysts easily search it and draw connections between peopleEnglish2·4 months agoMastodon is not currently on the list
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Why Isn't the "All" Feed Different for Each Instance?English4·4 months agoThe problem I see with this idea is that I have no idea who most people are on “my” instance or what sort of content they’re interested in. Even for a topic based instance like https://startrek.website/, outside of Star Trek, what are the chances that the interests of the members align?
The Lemmy developers were working on making user defined custom feeds. If that ever get implemented, I’d certainly give many ideas a try. But the Lemmy devs don’t have any new feed options on their priority list and I doubt they will anytime soon.
The main dev (only dev?) of piefed seems much more likely to implement new ideas. For example, I had mentioned that only votes from a community’s subscribers should be counted on posts to said community by default with the owner of the community given an option to count all votes. It was implemented within days.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Photography@discuss.online•Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity PortraitsEnglish2·4 months agoThey’re going to events and taking nice pictures and releasing them to the public domain.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Photography@discuss.online•Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity PortraitsEnglish3·4 months agoThey could also pay for good pictures to be released to the public domain themselves.
But if someone wants to spend their time to do this uncompensated, they aren’t doing any harm.
LOL I should have reread that one.
The data is not centralized, but everyone is using the same
aggravationaggregation service (indexer) to access the data.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•So, after using Lemmy for 1.5 Years. You are telling I am not even allowed to use Lemmy?English6·4 months agoNo. All of your direct interactions are with your instance which federates with others.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Kagi search engine now has a Fediverse search option.English8·4 months agoDon’t trust him based on his prior comments
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Kagi search engine now has a Fediverse search option.English181·4 months agoI’m not a fan of Kagi’s founder, so I generally don’t use it.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Saying "Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed" is too long, just Lemmy is reductive, "Threadiverse" doesn't really roll off the tongue,we are only a subset of the Fediverse. What would you call us? Horrible names allowedEnglish1·4 months agoI think this is a great illustration of my point. I like the culture beehaw.org has established more than what lemmy.blahaj.zone has encouraged. And I don’t particularly care about “the fediverse”. I care about the online communities I engage with.
Everyone is different and I make my recommendation based on what I think the person I’m making recommendations to would like most.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Saying "Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed" is too long, just Lemmy is reductive, "Threadiverse" doesn't really roll off the tongue,we are only a subset of the Fediverse. What would you call us? Horrible names allowedEnglish0·4 months agoI generally don’t. I don’t find it to be a useful grouping to reference or discuss.
Try piefed.social
Try Discuss.online
Try beehaw.org
Try programming.dev
I’m always referring to one, never the group.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English1·4 months agoRemoved by mod
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English1·4 months agoThey dictate the operations of their suppliers. They force large expansions in capital investment and then decide that they don’t want to renew the supplier relationship before the financing for the capital investments can be paid back. The only way suppliers can hope avoid this is to do what Walmart wants or constantly change their products in often superficial ways with branding agreements for IP of entertainment companies.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Excellent Reads@sh.itjust.works•Has Gratuity Culture Reached a Tipping Point?English1·4 months agoAll of those laws include a provision that the employer must pay at least the minimum wage of a non-tipped worker in any pay period where the tips received don’t account for the difference between the tipped minimum wage and the non-tipped minimum wage. Thus, everyone is receiving at least the non-tipped minimum wage unless the employer is breaking the law.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English5·4 months agoAmazon doesn’t handle shipping for a lot of the things they sell.
This is false. Very few products sold via Amazon are shipped independently from Amazon’s logistics services.
ericjmorey@discuss.onlineto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Can we please make a viable (federated!) amazon alternative? I have an idea!English1·4 months agono sketchy pricing based on bullwhip procurement.
Walmart’s procurement has been abusive to their suppliers (who often go out of business because of their relationship with Walmart) for decades. I think you may need to reassess your perception of their procurement strategy.
Substack is newsletter focused, subscriptions are for individual substack writers’ newsletters (you can’t access all substack newsletters with a single subscription) and it has a recommendation feature that writers like because it can help them grow their subscribers and therefore grow their revenue.