Wow, that’s bad. I would hate working with this so much.

Even if we see someone behave immorally, they can always repent.

Well, unless you believe in predestination.

Anyway, this is getting pretty far from either the video or King’s Army so I’m going to stop engaging.

You say that like Christian identity isn’t quite political. Even so, the way this organisation operates is distinctively political.

Genuinely, what even is the point of Labour at this point? “Unlike Reform and the Tories, we don’t want to leave the ECHR. We just want to make it utterly anaemic.”

of numbers instead of human-readable names

TBF, they have introduced a ‘verified’ system that lets you use human readable names.

You don’t have to wonder, the spell it out on their website:

We are not a political organization. We don’t stand for, represent, or align ourselves with any political party.

Still, I think campaigning against specific policy would meet the average person’s definition of political organisation.

Kinda like if the King would say climate change is bad, it’s political but it doesn’t really compromise his position as apolitical

Maybe when all the (major) parties agreed that climate change was real you could argue this, but now both Reform and the Tories are both doing climate change denial I don’t think you can. Besides, the idea that the monarch is apolitical when it uses its privileged position within the British state to lobby for the monarch’s personal interest against things like workers’ rights and, ironically enough, climate laws is plainly absurd.

Chris is probably just following the comm rule against editorialising titles.

🫩 I just want to sync my music between my computer and phone and I really can’t be arsed with this drama.

Yeah, people are tribal and decentralisation lets people express that in ways centralised platforms don’t. Something, something, tech won’t save us.

Clicking though to community to post and selecting a community from the create post page are same problem rearranged. A user who subbed to ~technology@piefed.social isn’t going to know the difference between !technology@lemmy.world, !technology@lemmy.zip and !technology@piefed.social.

Solution 2 in the post, multicommunities. I’m not sure it actually solves the problem though, as you still have to go to the actual community to post and I imagine multicomms add an extra layer of confusion to that.

And that relates to a book shop selling LLM-written books how? Digital artists still draw what’s attributed to them, an AI author hasn’t written what’s attributed to them.

It sounds like you’d be interested in Friendica that lets you do this.

I have looked into it a bit in the past and a Community Interest Company seems it’d be the best fit, it’s what the Matrix Foundation is registered as, but I just don’t know enough about the area to really say.

Only England and Wales‽ So my glorious Scottish pounds aren’t good enough for this ‘DotZip Ltd’?

(But damn, so professional. I wish I understood any of this stuff enough to get something like this set up for feddit.uk.)

They block the UK, your cheque will bounce!

iusesuse.fyi is available and only ~£6/year. 🤔

This reminds me of some of the goated instance names we’ve lost over the years. RIP iuserarchlinux.fyi, now you’re just a website peddling probable scamware.

You dropped this, queen. 👑

What’s your point?