It’s a term invented by Last.fm that didn’t really catch on more generally because it’s too silly even for the Internet.
It’s a term invented by Last.fm that didn’t really catch on more generally because it’s too silly even for the Internet.
You’re not wrong, but the other candidate has criticized Biden for being too soft in foreign policy and urged Netanyahu to “finish the problem.” Plus, with him you get a fascist autocracy at home.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905
“I swear to God I saw people burning in front of me. By god, no one could do anything. The man, the woman and the little girl burning in front of me, I swear to God. In front of me they burned, in front of me. Their souls left in front of me, in front of us, in front of all our eyes,” said Saleh Al-Jafarawi, an independent Palestinian journalist who filmed the massacre. “No one was able to do anything, no one was able to advance and get them. We tried, but we couldn’t, the fire was so strong that no one was able to advance and pull them out of the fire. They were burned alive. Their bodies were charred. This is a crime that we have never seen and no one has seen like it,” he added in a video posted on his Instagram account. “I swear to God the scenes that will remain in our memories, will remain in our hearts forever. We will never forget the scene that I witnessed today: The scene of the child and he is burning in the heart of the fire and no one was able to help him.”
This is what American tax dollars are funding. And neither of the election candidates proposes to stop it.
Which ones? I’ve used Firefox and Vivaldi (which is Chromium-based) interchangeably for the last couple of years, and I can’t remember noticing any difference in their ability to handle sites. The main difference I’ve noticed is that Firefox renders fonts more nicely in Linux.
Soon, users will have to choose between accepting Chrome’s inferior ad-blocking technology or switching to a different browser.
Doesn’t seem like a terribly difficult choice. Firefox it is.
Who would you vote for?
The only thing preventing it is a few greedy, sick little men with a lot of power. We are destroying life on our planet for their gain, though they already have many, many times more wealth than anyone could ever need or enjoy.
He is full of hot air though.
The media, as usual, talks as if they’re trying to discern his secret, rational plan. Even when he spouts fascist threats of mass oppression and murder, they discuss him as if he’s just another politician with policy proposals. It’s unclear under what circumstances he’d call in troops against Americans because he’s psychologically chaotic, fragile and highly volatile. Anything could trigger him to do so. The only thing that’s consistent is he threatens retribution against immigrants, trans people, Black people, women, and anyone who doesn’t worship him enough.
Possibly also what’s coming if Trump wins.
Fighting back for Israel does not have to take the form of a genocidal slaughter of innocents.
This rubbish reads like it was written by ChatGPT.
Just the thing to endear your party to the electorate before an election. For Republicans, a war actually does this. Not so sure about Democrats.
How does he know he’ll lose? From what I see in the polls there’s a good chance he could win
But are they buying expensive trucks? Still doubtful.
“I can totally understand why people have a problem with Jews because of the behavior of some extremist right wing Jews.” You might want to take a step back and think about that.
You yourself admit that worldwide antisemitism is a problem. These people are not thinking subtly. I can understand why people do all kinds of horrible things, but it doesn’t mean I’m sympathetic or defending them.
Holding all Jews responsible for what happens in Israel, let alone what a particular Israeli government does, is antisemitic.
I’m saying that a particular group of extreme right wing Jews is encouraging people the world over to make that antisemitic conflation. They do so because in the short term it serves their interests, but in the bigger picture it causes damage.
And no, it’s not our fault. It’s the fault of the antisemites.
It’s the fault of antisemites and those that egg them on.
See the pattern here?
Of course. Vile antisemitism has a long history.
The upside to Israel’s actions over the past year is sending a clear message that the Jewish state isn’t going anywhere, and if you try to kill us you will suffer greatly.
In the process it sends a message to the world that Israel is brutal, racist and hateful. It may end up damaging Israel’s interests more than helping. Netanyahu does what’s best for Netanyahu, not for Israel or for Jews.
You should get his name right if you’re going to incite action against him.
Not to be pedantic, but you might want to fix that typo. “Purpose”, not “propose”.
Trump’s holding rallies that explicitly promise a violent dictatorship and call for killing some of the most oppressed groups of people, and he’s about to be elected President for the second time. Then people like these cops are going to be celebrated and encouraged.
That won’t be a problem for them. Republicans spurn only until it’s to their personal advantage to un-spurn.