Reminds me of when we all made fun of conservatives for smashing the Keurig coffee makers they already bought and paid for.
Reminds me of when we all made fun of conservatives for smashing the Keurig coffee makers they already bought and paid for.
They said b*tchass, you’re on the .ml instance so b*tch gets censored for sexism or whatever.
Yeah, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act does not allow cops to access your medical records at all, unless they have a warrant. Even if they have a warrant, they can’t add or remove anything. No one at the hospital is going to tip off police; we want people to seek care without being afraid of the consequences. If the cops were involved in a car accident, they’ll have details from the vehicle registration. They’ll follow up when the patient is out of the hospital.
TLDR the cops can’t fuck with your medical records, and if the hospital released records illegally whoever did it is fukd.
And it’s still trending up! A shimmer of hope!
Who got rid of it, and when??
The convention hasn’t even happened yet? 🤔
Last I heard, Sci-Hub isn’t accepting new publications. ☹️
Dawg, you just fabricated your idea of what the other dude thinks in that second paragraph. Touch grass, call someone, go outside.
Wilcoxson’s! They have all sorts of interesting flavors, love their stuff!
Yeah, don’t go kill a wild (organic) animal and eat it, go to the grocery store and buy the antibiotic-riddled meat produced in awful conditions by a factory farm like the rest of us you disgusting FUCKS! /s
Dawg, I live in a real rural place. Maybe like 20% of the people I know use wild game as their primary source of meat; they take 1 elk or maybe 2 deer and fill up the freezer for the year to feed their family.
Trophy hunters, however, can absolutely FUCK right off.
Edit: and so can this wolf dude too.
My bad, thanks for the source!
By definition, if the user of the software is not free to do as they wish with the software, the software is not free/libre. It could fit the definition of open source, but it is not free/libre if you are restricting what the user can do with your source code.
And starting comments with “Wrong.” Is just rude.
Drivers hate this one brick
You should go outside.
Hang on, hang on, I think you missed it. It applies to “ALL PERSONS.” You’ll note that it does not include “unless you’re an illegal immigrant.”
“I don’t understand your point of view, so I think you need therapy” is a very condescending point of view.
The comment above you is making the point of
Angry at society -> Take out anger on society
The shooter doesn’t give a shit about the victims as individuals; to him they’re just components of the society, or actors within the society that he thinks wronged him somehow. They’re part of the problem to him.
I think you’re assuming that the shooter was seeing and experiencing the world and interpreting it the same way you do. THEY DO NOT, they are mentally ill, and have different thought patterns to people who are neurotypical. They have managed to convince themselves that they don’t have a problem, that society is the problem.
It would be cheaper at first to promote the idea
That’s a pretty charitable take for a multi billion dollar company.
NPR is Marxist propaganda?