When I feel the need to take care of myself, I try to choose one or more activities between
talk with friends or family via chat or phonecalls
go run or walk in as green a place as I can find within walking distance, bonus points if there are trees
tidy up a bit
write thoughts
cook something more elaborate than usual for myself
breathe consciously, recenter myself, or meditate
Poor thing’s ear is connected to its tail
Nope, that’s the red strip on the left.
Reverse image search gave this pop-sci article from 2009:
https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1283
Slightly different though. No grey part, though the legend argues that deutérium is unstable below the horizontal line, and “We are here” in smaller font
This just dawned on me not long ago. Like how does someone write the character of Lucius Malfoy and then go “what if I used my tremendous wealth and influence to lobby ceaselessly against people who transitioned into my category from the more dominant one, and who already tend to be discriminated against violently as a result? I could maybe use a theatrical rhetoric of victimization to distract from my very shady alliances.”
Like wtf lady you know that makes you the bad guy you literally wrote a series of books explaining it to children.
“Lapel” was an interesting find. That and “development” really hammered in the importance of accentuation. I’m still unsure of what I want to do with “schedule”. “Burger” sometimes sounds off when I say it.
Sidhu Moose Wala, the other comments are from Lemmy.ml, maybe you’re defederated
What the fuck? Its elbow is equivalent to pour wrist??
They’re not entirely wrong, of course, but they’re really stretching this simple stereotype into some deep difference in psychologies and assigning it to this “concept of a marketplace of idea vs. rationality and enlightenment” oversimplification.
Honestly, as a European person who’s been through bits of both school systems, it mainly sound like an uninformed rant from an American who’s angry with the state of the US and who’s completely idealized Europe as a result – even though their only vista into EU cultures is a bunch of titles of unread articles from the part of the US media they most agree with.
Which would be fine if they hadn’t worded what amounts to an overindulged shower thought in such a peremptory fashion.
Basically they behaved like their own stereotype of “american psychology”, which we do have quite enough of at home thank you very much.
As much as I’m not into pee fetishes, I’d be really uncomfortable lumping nice weirdos who like to consensually urinate on each other in the privacy of their homes, with a piece of human garbage who takes sexual pleasure in humiliating women who’re just there for an already pretty stressful job interview. It sounds like the fetish is more in the layers upon layers of domination and humiliation than in the pee itself, and that’s way more disgusting to me.
It looks like the blowback is less about one side beinng better or worse than the other, and more about this whole thesis sounding like the most obnoxious fourteen year old you’ve ever met larping as a sociologist with zero substantiation to their sweeping statements
Yes and 1$=1$. If you look at stuff in a vacuum everything is symmetrical, that’s a nothing statement.
Still though, who’s liable when they hallucinate something illegal?
yes, yes, I meant income tax specifically, proportionally to the aforementioned income.
Argue all you want though, factual reality is just there if you want to look at statistics, both for perpetrators and victims. If you meant like anyone can kill anyone, then money is also symmetrical in that anyone can get it and spend it in precisely the same way.
It would seem weirder to me to have 100% of people be a protected class
The word just existed since 1652
Of course murdering someone due to their sex is illegal if the victim is male, it’s murder
Nominative determinism is strong in this one