Isaac (ieh)

I suggest using the power of your free speech to walk up in person too anyone of color and using any of those words to their face and see how your “free speech” goes.

Furthermore, a little reasearch on what “free speech” means and doesn’t mean might be in order.

What I find interesting is that so many people seem to want to stand up on the side of bigotry and demand their “right” to be a bigot and use bigoted language. I’m not sure that’s really a great look.

Perhaps you misunderstand, so let’s go back to the basics.

Lemmy.World TOS prohibits the use of, among other things, ableist slurs.

If you use such slurs, expect to face consequences.

I am a Lemmy admin, and part of what I do is enforce the TOS when I see violations.

We may choose to simply remove rule-breaking comments, or hand out temp-bans or perma-bans to those that can’t seem to follow the rules.

If you cannot follow the rules, I suppose you will eventually find out the consequences for yourself.

So ultimately, I don’t care if you agree with the TOS or not. Only whether you follow them.

I don’t understand why so many people here are standing up on the side of bigotry. I really don’t. It makes me sad.

If it takes me to make you empathetic towards the victims of those ableist slurs… I don’t know what to tell ya. I don’t think it’s a good look, though.

That’s the idiotic take you chose to run with? Fuck fascism.

But fuck ableist slurs. You shouldn’t attack fascism using slurs that harm real people. And even if you disagree, ableist slurs are against the rules.

It’s like getting pulled over for speeding on your way to a protest and accuding the cop of supporting fascism (which might be a fair comparison in that case, sure, I realise this isn’t a perfect analogy).

Call Patel any number of delightful terms that point out his fascism, inhumanity, stupidity, idiocy - whatever you’d like. But don’t be ableist, transphobic, homophobix, racist, misogynist et cetera when you do so.

Is it that difficult?

So? Is ableism by someone on the spectrum supposed to be acceptable? Do I need to find a person who is black to give me permission to use the N word? Maybe I should find a woman to give me permission to be misogynist?

Interesting. You stand against homophobia, but stand for ableism. Perhaps you also measure you neighbors’ lawns with a ruler?

Do you watch police brutality and think, “THIN BLUE LINE! HUAH!!!”? Let’s discuss other stupid things. Or maybe you might stop standing up for bigotry.

If you don’t like the rules, don’t use the site.

Well, this is simply incorrect. I ran across this thread and reported several comments, bringing it to the attention of the moderators, who took action.

And you are free to have yourr opinions, but again, I suggest complying with the Lemmy.world TOS. If you think the TOS is asinine, that’s fine - as long as you comply with them.

Every so often, I browse the media posted to the instance to look for spam. And sometimes that leads me to threads I’d otherwise miss - I had to see what this image was about in context! lol

Rosie ROCKS. <3 <3 <3

Please be cautious here. You have crossed a line that, as a mod, I would remove your comments for incivility and personal attacks. I allow such things to go further when they are directed at myself, but I am certainly done conversing with you. But I think you’ve made the kind of person you are quite clear.

You can project all you like. I don’t care. I do think standing up for bigotry is not a good look for you, but that’s your call to make.

But you will face consequences if you break the TOS.

pat yourself on the back, you’re antibullying saviour!

Do you pat yourself on the back for standing up against bigotry? I would think it’s the human thing to do.

If words mean nothing, I suggest trying that theory out by going up to a person of colour and using a certain word to them. Or even call them “colored”, which used to be the preferred term.

So if words mean something, perhaps it’s worth the time to consider their use carefully.

You think linking to one particular source that tries to explain the problem means they’re in charge?

Well, I guess Lemmy bows to that organization considering it’s in the Lemmy TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

You don’t have to like the rules, but you certainly have to follow them.

I wasn’t the one who did it, and personally, I think it could have gone either way, but while I don’t think I would have removed that one, I certainly would not argue against its removal. I don’t think the moderator needs to calm down at all. A ban for that comment might’ve been rather much, but a simple removal is perfectly fine.

Reminder that ableist slurs are against the Lemmy.World TOS. Please refrain.

Is that supposed to be a “gotcha”?

I don’t enforce being a zionist or not, but I do enforce the Lemmy TOS. If you cannot abide by that, you will eventually find that Lemmy will not abide you breaking the rules.

I know what I call someone breaking Lemmy TOS: A rulebreaker.

Please be aware that we are currently monitoring the situation. I may or may not have some information for you in a couple of days or so. I apologize that it took a bit to reply to this, but we are looking at it now.