





In another world, generative AI could be trained, deployed, and utilized ethically. And in that other world, it would probably be something of an odd footnote instead of a societal landmark.


Emerson Green convinced me that p-zombies are plausible. So there’s no way to know if a teleporter would end your consciousness.


The point is that everyone is susceptible to it.


Artisanal, farm-to-table entertainment systems.


That efficiency is an absolute good.


But have you heard of Niri?


Guys I’m starting to think that maybe capitalism and democracy are not 100% compatible
D:


Good thing SSDs are cheap and plentiful at the moment.
Er, wait…



The worst part is:
We’re in this position because of slow productivity (lack of infrastructure investment) and extreme inequality (lack of wealth tax and lack of welfare spending).
If we simply cut — even in the areas that really need it, like military — these problems will persist and even worsen, because it’s basically saying “okay, economy’s over — winners are winners forever now”.
For that reason, we should probably pitch “fossil fuel austerity”.
Fiscal conservatives like to say “the government’s spending is just like yours”, even though it’s not.
So why don’t we copy their approach and say “gas is too expensive for the government, just like it’s too expensive for you — so just like you, we’re comparison shopping and looking for a better deal… like solar!”
facists
Experts in faces.


“Where” is a question that applies to the physical world. The dream people are constituted of something more fundamental than matter.


The big issue is probably heat.
x86 iGPUs on desktop OSes mimic PCIe peripherals, so they encounter a bottleneck that doesn’t exist on gaming OSes.
The part of the chip that handles PCIe interactions will get hotter than the parts that actually do useful rendering tasks, so the whole SoC will throttle down while the CUs are still bored.


Completely different game solo. Stealth is more viable and necessary. I prefer full squad, personally.
Nevertheless, research has produced positive empirical evidencesupporting a weaker version of linguistic relativity:[4][5] that a language’s structures influence a speaker’s perceptions, without strictly limiting or obstructing them.


Only 2/3 through it, but I had to come back to say: The hosts are doing a fantastic job of digging in and analyzing the manosphere as a phenomenon of more than just gender or patriarchy or grifting, but more fundamentally one of capitalism and social fragmentation.
I think the guests are reluctant to play that angle themselves, as two men being interviewed by two women, so I really appreciate the hosts being bold enough (and intellectually curious enough, in the first place) to allow for a reality that’s messy and complicated and doesn’t take the manosphere’s “men vs women” premise for granted.


The stuck-on residue is real.
But here’s the brutal reality: it’s not just residue; it’s residon’t.
Options: