It’s almost as though the guardian wants to sell newspapers 🤔.
It’s almost as though the guardian wants to sell newspapers 🤔.
I also understand
It’s why they’re mostly on Facebook too. And Biden on Tiktok during the elections. Because the masses huddle there.
Apart from a small number of outlier organisations they’re all still on these shitty networks. They want eyeballs as much as any other company.
Let’s fucking go lads!
Is this the same founder of brew dog whose female staff are told never to be in a room alone with him? Or is that the other one?
Absolute bants if they serve a lettuce salad at lunch.
But who am I kidding, this is a right wing think tank in 'murica. It’ll be McDonald’s.
Never used BlueSky but what’s wrong with the multitude of apps already written for Mastodon? Also, do the features nap one to one with Mastodon or will some features work and not others?
I find using the Mastodon apps easy. What I don’t find easy is getting the same level of engagement and an app won’t solve that. But it’s a totally different beast so I am ok with that.
Bonfire Of The Regulanities
Wait hang on… They don’t cook it freshly nowadays? What the crap? What do they do? Microwave it? How long does it take to cook a burger 😂?
I agree on paper. But we’ve seen many time before “legally responsible” isn’t really a deterrent for some people in society. If there’s money to be made, made it will be!
All I’m saying is that if they suddenly approve the listing after the chancellor returns despite the lack of transparency I will not be surprised in the slightest.
It will be interesting to see if the Chancellor returns back from her trip to China and whispers in the stock exhanche’s ear to allow the listing.
I thought the ban was a threat. What they really want is the success of Tiktok to be owned by the US. That’s why they were happy at one point if Tiktok sold to a US company.
Made in the USA… or taken by force.
According to the extrajudicial notice, this allows users to associate sexual identity to “a mental illness or abnormality” and allows “the defense of professional limitations based on gender.”
Why does anyone associate with this site. It’s beyond me.
As PM she was the First Lord Of The Treasury (amongst the many other titles she got as a PM: Queen of the Andals and the First Men, Lady of the Seven Kingdoms, and Protector of the Realm) so how is she not responsible for the economy?
Yes that will do
Five minutes earlier? God damn bro. That’s coffee making time.
Oh we did. Just not to spend on improving the country or infrastructure ☺️.
Lots of people got lots of rich.
Do you honestly think that would stop him taking the UK gov to court. It would not. He would claim it is a personal attack on his companies rights to free speech.
Then the goal for any legislation is simple: don’t make it personal to Twitter and instead reference “platforms that openly allow misinformation and hate on their servers that do business in the UK without appropriate and swift moderation”. Something like that.
The goal won’t be to fine Twitter or Musk directly. It will be to move the needle in a way that makes doing business with him or his companies not worth the hassle. Musk could win the court battle, but ultimately lose his hate machine. Absolutely fine 😉.
But let’s be honest… None of this will happen 😂.
I thought the exact same thing. A badly cropped picture assuming everyone is familiar with the site it is taken from. Not even a fucking link back to the site.