You can always adapt to your how repo. But yeah, that’s the point. If you can trust people to make changes on a repo then you should be able to trust them in using some kind of commit structure.
Generic names are probably used in order to crate a familiar, easy to remember, structurized commit format.
You can always water it down. The point is to have some order in the commits. Otherwise is just messy.
Please use Conventional Commits. Simple and easy to use. Plus it is very easy so combine with Versioning techniques like Semantic Versioning.
Haven’t found one yet. In general you shouldn’t trust any crack. That’s why you have to check every game with virustotal and restrict internet acces to all of them. Fitgirl posts her repacks there too.
1337x is good. Open it with tor and get rid of all the shit. Then get the magnet.
We don’t fucking care about your new boss Mozilla
You can create aliases
This is the way
Nice, my lovely C syntax. Thank you!
I thought major software devs used signed commits. I don’t have that much git experience and I have everything gpg signed even since the first repo I did.
This makes me question a lot of software.
How? For real I hate python not having ; and { and depending on tabs and spaces (PAIN)
My secret tip: go to inspect element, search the box that has the link and copy the embedded link. You are welcome ;)
Edit: Also do all of that from tor. Once you got the link you can go back to your torrent client.
Holy shit people are toxic. The poor guy that responded.
o7 the real chad. I hope others maintain his legacy inside AMD.
You can use backports too!
The disease part is too real
Also Nintendogs
Well how fucked up are his/her commits? Straight blinding matterial + useless?
What’s wrong with having a some year old software? Does it do what you need? Yes. Then what? I have all I need on Debian. Why should I care of new updates. Security? Yes we have Debian security because of that. Look, y’all had the xyz backdoor package in your systems because it was new. Me as a Debian stable user I didn’t have to deal with it. Did I lose something by not having the latests software? No. Well maybe less crashes.
Most privative software also gets weekly updates. Does it make it better? No. You may prefer that.
Also I don’t get the point about the version numbering of Debian packages. Every team uses the versioning they want.
From my experience software that updates a lot tends to break old features a lot too.
Debian suporting freesoftware projects or other stuff doesn’t look as a relevant argument. I mean if you prefer using privative stuff and using that kind of software. Do whatever you like with your Google/Facebook/Apple friends.
But don’t come intoxicate the community with this bullshit.