

And what science would that be? Basic understanding of morality, right and wrong, is one of the first things humans learn.
'You’re not allowed to hit your sister '; A normal five year old would have that understanding.


And what science would that be? Basic understanding of morality, right and wrong, is one of the first things humans learn.
'You’re not allowed to hit your sister '; A normal five year old would have that understanding.


ty AI bot, very informative


They want to call the recipient in connection to the announcement so that the recipient hears it from the committee first hand. And since the announcement is made during the day (figure that), the call is made no matter the recipients time zone.


Removed by mod


Considering the potency of smartphones causing ADD, the results are hardly surprising.
There’s are reasons schools around the world are starting to ban these things.
A Pro-trans rights nazi!? I swear you people are Martians, with claims so bizarre.


Could say the same so maybe just leave it


Certainly not democratic since all opposition was abolished, and the press was censored.


Cyprus, Chile and Uruguay? You’ve got to be kidding… these failed states have horrendous human rights records


No. The question at hand is, of course, my comment to which you replied; to exemplify these, Communist states that so champions Democracy and Human Rights. And I’m just waiting…
This thread is now part of the meme


Great whataboutism, but irrelevant to the question at hand


Communists in Italy never held state power…


That’s just a flat lie. Communists have never championed Democracy and human rights. PRC, North Korea, Vietnam, the Soviet Union, none promoting either democracy or human rights in practice. What possible state falls into your arguments here, I struggle to think of a single one.
I mean Cambodia under Pol Pot!? Human rights, what a joke.


I, of course, care about informed consent. What I find funny is that folks on here don’t seem to find a semblance of balanced character when asked to answer a simple question. The truth is that the person in question never claimed she was raped, that’s it. Whether you all think she is a rape victim or not is truth be told irrelevant to the question. That’s all.


The question was simple, and the answer was no. And what a waste of time otherwise
Sure but that doesn’t support your argument. And certainly does not support the obvious conclusion that a 13 year old knows murder is wrong!