We?
idk this person, and I only know what you have written about them. There might be a lot more nuance, or not. But this post is not nuanced, probably too hastly written, without thinking twice about what you wrote and you do not seem to have the intentions you suggest you have. I can’t believe you wrote this because you want to “save the trans community from crazy fakers” or whatever.
I doubt OP cares about that and they wrote dismorphia and not disphoria. Both things have no obvious connection to the person OP describes? Also idk if I like citing ICD, DSM or whatever as part of an argument on this topic
mkvtoolnix is the best tool for this stuff. iirc ffmpeg has some limitations in this area
More like “lightroomed” and that’s a normal step in photography. The colours are extreme and that was a choice. One that I don’t quite understand because when reducing saturation, I like it better and I don’t think it looks less like a painting. Probably not much about this picture is accidental, which doesn’t fit the spitit of this community, but in my opinion it’s a great pic.
wtf hahah
This is inaccurate. You are not buying it (the media), you are buying the right to stream it (as long as the seller provides the media as a stream). You don’t “buy” a movie unless you are paying for it’s ownership, which would be millions of dollars. For physical releases you buy the disk and the right to watch it under certain conditions (DRM). And you generally don’t have a right be able to “buy” or have access to all media.
But all that doesn’t automaticly make it amoral. this comment is gonna be downvoted to hell
edit: There are probably gonna be more responces, so this will address everything else I have to say. What I wrote is how things are legally, more or less. I don’t like that either. I do consider piracy stealing (under current laws) and morally right. Stealing is just not that great term for digital stuff. Please don’t try to (uselessly) sway me and don’t infight
Do we also need more doctorates?
I assumed that. There is the idea to exclude groups from the trans community to make the community not look worse (to cishets) and to not waste time helping the other groups. I.e. saving the trans community at least effort. I assumed that is your (at least suggested) reason. But instead you don’t care about trans people (maybe neither in a good or bad was) and just don’t want people like the person you described to be helped by anyone. Or you even don’t want them to exist at all. Is this assumption correct?
Also some people are crazy, big deal