![](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/859c860c-7ea9-4810-b4ea-7c7e8ee082e5.webp)
![](https://lemmy.fan/pictrs/image/1fe4ded9-5974-46fe-8cd7-1112e5f8c1c6.jpeg)
God speed and keep smacking your head against that wall.
God speed and keep smacking your head against that wall.
That’s just what people have said to me, personally, in this thread. Including you. The rest of the thread is worse:
Yes, that was the mocking I was referring to, champ. Good work.
For the rest, I’m seeing you taking comments about a dumb workflow so personally you had to make your own comment and then spiral out when people start mocking you.
Its a dumb workflow, you look silly for defending it. Touch grass.
Nobody is bitching or moaning at you lol.
We’re mocking you for spiraling out about a problem you’ve created for yourself. While you somehow also simultaneously claim its not a problem and works just fine.
So rare that you have to bitch and moan about it
When something is true for all browsers and happens “several times a month” – thats not a glitch. That’s how it works.
The tabs persist… because they’re saved, and then restored. You know how I know that? Because I’ve been doing it for TWENTY FUCKING YEARS.
Obviously you haven’t though, right? Or you wouldn’t be here complaining about how that doesn’t work…
I’m not fighting anything except your ignorant horseshit comments - the software works how I want.
And yet you’re here bitching about how it doesn’t. Make it make sense.
Tabs also need to be closed occasionally for major updates. You know how I know that? Because it happens regularly enough that you’re here whining about it.
You’re welcome to keep banging your head against that wall, but if you publically whine about how it hurts your forehead, people are gonna tell you its your own fault. And they’re right.
It can handle them just fine – they’re meant to be impermanent. They never claimed you can keep hundreds of tabs open forever.
I can hammer in nails with the back of a screwdriver. That doesn’t make it the right tool for the job.
I am using software in a way that suits my intent.
Against the intentions of that software. Square peg, round hole.
How you feel doing that is how we feel several times a month.
Because you’re doing something dumb. That’s really all there is to it.
You can add swear words to the dictionary on iOS, you don’t have to add them as contacts.
Regardless of what we call them, or how we understand them, the laws of physics nevertheless apply – as you eluded to in your example of animals being subject to gravity, despite their understanding of it.
This is not true of race or gender. They exist exclusively as categorizations and narratives within our collective set of definitions and understandings. They do not exist outside of human culture.
So at best what you’re saying is that our understanding of gravity is the result of a social construct. Which is just needlessly pedantic.
But since that’s apparently what we’re doing then your statement is still incorrect. It should be:
“Gravity” is a social construct.
Neat, but none of that makes gravity a social construct. Race and gender are.
Given your “it becomes like I drink water”, I think you have a serious problem.
They’re explaining that after getting that drunk, even drinking just water makes them puke. Not saying that they drink alcohol like it’s water.
If my brother has red hair and is 6 feet, and I have brown hair, and am 5 feet, we would still be the same race, so no, there’s no correlation to race there, nor is it important to note. Because race is a social construct.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fallacy
a false or mistaken idea
You’re thinking specifically of logical fallacies.
I simply just didn’t think of it
Nobody would consider hair color, eye color, or height among people with the same skin color as part of their “race” – that’s the point I was making.
Mmm nope. It’s a fundamental force.
You’ll never believe this but I’m chugging absynth and installing Red Star OS.