• 12 Posts
  • 76 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • Good question. Like we measure or prove anything in science or math?

    If it’s a scientific theory like a law of nature, you can create novel testable predictions on how it’ll affect the minds of moral agents like humans.

    If it’s based on math we can derive moral truths from axioms. E.g using game theory.

    Whatever you use for most things we can derive the same conclusions. That’s why most professional philosophers believe in objective morality.

    You should read the link I shared. It contains explanations, many more arguments and counter arguments put forth across thousands of years.








  • ought’s are separate from morality. The Euthyphro dilemma illustrates this:

    “Is something good because you ought to do it or you ought to do it because it’s good?”

    If you agree with the latter then what makes something good (morality) is separate and can be used to derive oughts.

    There are many models of objective morality. Famous ones are based on God or karma which is a law of nature in Buddhism. It’s like a weak law like you can go against like how you can pull two magnets apart using a greater force.

    I suggest you read the link I shared.



  • Calling slaughter of an animal “murder” doesn’t follow

    Yeah murder technically means an unlawful killing of another human being. You can replace “murder” with the word “slaughter” in the argument.

    you can’t make logical argument on moral ideas

    I was writing from a perspective of moral realism which says objective moral facts exist just like in math or science. (Not everyone agrees with it)

    So in this framework, you can treat “torturing innocent is wrong” as any other objective claim like “magnets attract iron” or 1+1=2.



  • If you believe that moral facts are self evident or intuitive—I think it’s called intuitionism—we can solve this dilemma.

    The hidden weakness is the premise “murder is wrong,” because it may not be true

    It’s intuitive that murder is wrong so under intuitionism it becomes a fact.

    talking animal bred to want its own consumption

    I think ethical vegans avoid meat because the animal didn’t consent to being killed. If some animal wants to be eaten, it’ll be morally good to fulfil its desire like assisted suicide or euthanasia in case of humans.