![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
So are caves, yet humans can very easily cause damage to them accidentally, let alone deliberately
So are caves, yet humans can very easily cause damage to them accidentally, let alone deliberately
If their message was anti whaling and they cut down trees as well as sabotaged boats, would you be “well they attack boats too so that’s fine”?
I never once said I disagree with their message, but doesn’t mean I need to agree with their methods
If their message is that oil is bad and that government should be doing more, they should be targeting oil companies, lobbyists, government officials, companies that have excess waste and chemical use (coke im looking at you)… Not heritage listed stuff that’s mostly maintained by volunteers
Going after a painting that’s behind glass is VERY different to going after the stone henge that has no protective layer, and most importantly of all, has nothing to do with the target of their cause
saying it destroyed the stone henge is a major exaggeration, saying it did no damage is also just as wrong. The English heritage society emphasised that it was only no VISIBLE damage left, however they also said it did cause damage.
It’s just like how you can’t touch walls in caves because any change in the oils and stuff in our skins can cause long term damage even though there’s no immediate visible damage
If you ever dive into the filth that is r/conservative, you’ll see that this has just reenforced their views that he needs to win and they need to do anything to make that happen…I don’t think there’s anything that could snap that cult out of it at this point
He’s had to shell out for both to appeal them… The first I believe he put up cash, the second he used properly as a bond
In other words, a big customer finally got effected
This has a similar feel to those cheap “international call cards” that uses hacked PBX systems through their own proxy so their users don’t know it’s going through random hacked systems
31 days*
Here let me fix that for you
EU: demands changes to allow non-verifiable software
Apple:
disagrees, but allows itdoes half assed job to try and make regulations look bad for its users
platform browser less secure
TheRegister: Damned Apple!!
That sounds like the start of a horror movie
It’s got romance, action, comedy, fantasy, safe for kids and families… Covers most groups
Shitter gave them the authority when they signed an agreement saying they would do the very thing you’re upset Australia is asking them to do
Either they never should have signed, should announce publically that they no longer support and no longer wish to be a signatory to the statement, or should abide.
They can’t sign things saying they will do everything to help remove these videos globally, and then get upset the first time someone asks them to. It doesn’t matter if it’s Australia or another party to the agreement, they agreed to it.
So if shitter didn’t think it was appropriate, why did they ever sign saying they agreed to it?
This was a terrorist act, it’s violent videos, no self respecting platform would want that content on there anyway, and why is it that shitter is the only platform that has a problem with this one?
The other platforms all took it down without even needing to be asked
Yes Australia doesn’t have a great history when it comes to censorship, but musk is a deplorable human for fighting this one and it’s a strange hill to die on
Well let’s face it … if it wasn’t for the sanctions, these companies would probably still be in business there because they have zero morals… So yeah once the dust settles they’ll waste no time in trying to get back in there
The same oil refineries which they have sanctions on so people won’t buy from? Those ones?
I hope you can work this out because I’m having a similar issue with my new voron 2.4 build… Though mine isn’t a kit and is using a dragon hotend
I’ve kinda had to put it on hold due to health but I plan on trying to diagnose it more when I get some good health days
Even more ironic is a bunch of the delays were caused by Australia demanding the French change the designs from nuclear to diesel
No, because I don’t agree with their methods… Just like any extremist group might have a good message but doesn’t mean I agree with them bombing oil pipelines or kidnapping people
Attacking rocks does nothing to progress their cause… Attacking things in the environment doesn’t even line up with their cause of wanting to protect the environment
As long as they stick to actually attacking the companies and groups that actually are the cause of the problems, I would support their methods and as a result, them as a group