I agree, this is an anti-pattern for me.
Having explicit throw
keywords is much more readable compared to hiding flow-control into helper functions.
I agree, this is an anti-pattern for me.
Having explicit throw
keywords is much more readable compared to hiding flow-control into helper functions.
Positive and negative what?
That’s a valid argument, but a very weak one. If we are not completely sure something is an improvement in all aspects are we just to dismiss it altogether?
Maybe search for this on kaggle? Or scrape Wikipedia?
This is the major reason for me. I really liked yaml, because it is way more readable to me than JSON. But then I kept finding new and more confusing yaml features and have realized how over-engineered it is.
Yaml would be great language if it had its features prunned heavy.
They’ve lost potential revenue, but that is not the same as if amazon would come to their house and had stolen their only rucksack prototype.
Potential revenue is not your property.
It still sucks though.
It works great for a closed group of people, all on one instance. Another data point that federation is hard.
This is all hard to do because it is hard to determine people’s race on lemmy. Some usernames give it away but most don’t. And I don’t go snooping trough their post history to find that out.
Oh and the implication is that that could further devalue US bonds. Got ya, thanks.
I’m reading this at 4:39 it seems like you got woken up by the alarm, could not fall asleep again and grudgingly made this comic
Giving them access to Jellyfin is not fully “copying” a movie, it is just access to streaming (they can download, but that’s on them).
Overall, this makes little sense anymore and I feel that limiting data sharing is hard to conceptualize, let alone prevent with regulation.
All responses are saying “it is illegal”. But is it more illegal than pirating a movie for yourself only? Would it still be illegal if you would have paid for the movie? In that case it seems like lending the dvd to a friend…
It started as actual unpublished technical descriptions of underlying technology.
Why would you not be upgrading due to a new feature of python? You don’t like new features or was that a badly wordered sentence?
If they made that, they could also make it so one can pay 10x more for each additional icon.
So 10e for one, 100e for two, 1000e for three and so on.
This would allow us to recognise all people seeking attention by flashing money very easily. Bonus points if we are able to filter feeds by number of icons.
I wouldn’t say that Linux & Gimp are objectively better, but they sure are better in the long run, since you plop “gimp” into a nix configuration and never have to deal with installation and cracking.
Everything outside of your home dir? This will prevent applications and logs and configuration to be backed up.
You can use ncdu cli to see which dirs take the most space.
Ok now I feel bad for being pedantic and to really helping:
flatpacks are installed ~/.local/share/flatpak
and /var/lib/flatpak
, depending on distro/flatpak installation I think. On my machine they are in ~/.local/share/flatpak
, but there are people reporting having them in /var/lib/flatpak
.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/flatpak/comments/f6uq3z/where_are_flatpaksflatpak_apps_installed/
Btw, I’d also exclude ~/.cache
(for obvious reasons) and everything out outside of /home
.
Documentation should be generated from code imo