If there’s one thing the past six months have taught me it’s that republicans and democrats are exactly the same.

Oh. Wait.

Then I’ll just enjoy eating my popcorn in piece for once! Good job mods!

That’s the cycle right? Chloe was too good for Rachel. Max was too good for Chloe. Amanda was too good for Max. I’m dying to see who is going to get her heart ripped out by Amanda in the next installment.

I’m bae all the way, but let’s face it, happy endings are for losers. We’re here for the drama.

Last time someone posted this, the topic was overrun by CCP shills in like two secs. I’m going to go and get my popcorn in anticipation.

Vote blue it’s the least you can do?

I’m guessing they are both gonna get some Os without finishing the game.

Based on my brief forays into Roman traffic, the denizens of Rome most salute by shaking their fist and yelling rude things about my mother.

Furries keep the Internet running. Fansly is going to experience a bunch of outages.

Where is this from? The Thing (1984)?

Classic must read:

https://peachfront.diaryland.com/enderhitlte.html

I love the sandman. I have yearned for an adaptation for years. Then we get one and it’s actually good. Not good for comic book TV. Actually GOOD good.

And then the show goes and gets himself and the show cancelled because he’d a fucking sex creep. Fuck you Neil.

Also, fuck you Amanda fucking Palmer. It took a while before we found out, but you’ve been complicit in this fucking stuff for ages.

Honestly, I’m developing massive trust issues, I’m starting to reflexively fear liking stuff because I’m pretty sure one of the people involved with it is going to turn out to be a massive predator any minute now.

I’m more of a “more crap” and “Copy (4) of New Folder” kind of guy.

deleted by creator

Misogyny

Yeah, sort of. Basically the guy that is bringing the action has to show that the entity being sued is causing irreparable harm in order to get the judge to say “stop doing that until we can have a trial”.

But on appeal, the roles are reversed. The other entity had to show that the lower court prohibiting him from doing the thing he was doing is causing him irreparable harm.

It’s quite possible for both parties to be able show that this is the case. It’s not (always, necessarily) a partisan issue.

(Disclaimer: IANAL, and all I know about American federal law is from following the news)

Maybe I’m just getting old, but it gets harder and harder to tell.

It’s always projection

Except that you’re dead wrong about the actual literal text of the article.

But arguing with pompous ideologies is boring, so welcome to the block list.

All cops are bolsheviks, didn’t you hear ;)

I went into the section about “environmental factors” with a lot of trepidation, but it was surprisingly good!