deleted by creator

I am also very confused about the slug part because the dot is supposedly killing in alphabetical order. Yet the dot was going to have her walk into a slug in the elevator a while before her name was up.

Apparently this entity cares so much about the alphabet it stopped targeting her to go after the september guy so what gives?

Someone theorized the slugs may hold you and kill you off when its your time but the list the dr uses to realize its in alphabetical time isn’t time of death, its time of disappearance. These slugs do capture on video so If people cant have been alive inside a slug without anyone or themselves noticing.

You just say that to distract yourself from the fact you indirectly fuck multiple bedbugs every time you mess around in bed.

They haven’t damaged anything. They just bait the news into writing publicity for the cause and it works because people believing “they damage an artifact” generates clicks.

People have publicly killed themselves to to make people pay attention to the biggest challenge humanity has ever faced.

Such is unaffective because news doesn’t cover it.

The chemicals in our rain from industrial waste that will wash these stones clean, do way more damage. But you don’t know that because not enough people talk about it.

Well you could always just use the proper name. The cc license in question IS anti commercial. A great deal of ai is opens source and non commercial and to those cc is fair game. But if commercial is where you draw the line then envoking this license may do.

This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International)

Calling it “anti-ai” when its not removes power from your argument. Your invoking something that does not exit and linking to something seemingly unrelated.

Now the bigger question i have, have had since i have seen people do this.

Why is there still not an actual anti-ai license? Seems obvious that there is a need for it? I dont know much about how licenses are created but it strikes me as odd.

Well i understand its to combat ai from training on your comments right, maybe also to poison the data?

I just don’t see what taking a non relevant licensee and giving it a different name is doing to stop that. Trivial to filter stuff like this out in a dataset.

At best an individual data scraping company decides to honor it out of kindness. At worst people think that its a real license and copy it with a false sense of security.

Just FYI the license in your comment doesn’t actually exist and the creative commons license it links to does not mention AI anywhere.

Sometimes your kid is doing something you feel like you should correct. Ask yourself this question.

“Is or may this behavior cause actual harm to themselves or anyone else?”

If the answer is no ask yourself:

“Are you already exhausted?”

Energy is a limited resource, even more so for a parent. You have are responsible for your child well being. That means in a time of actual crisis you need the energy to make the right decisions.

Sometimes (definitely not always) Learn to converse your energy by looking the other way if they are not causing actual problem.

Examples are Playing with food, coloring on papers there not supposed to color on but you didn’t still need and some forms of tantrums.

A wikipedia page detailing the dispute between apple who refused to help the fbi to acces personal messages is a tech detail that doesnt mean annything in context of firms handing over data to government?

Okay dokey 👍

Your just arguing in bad faith because you lost the argument hard.

About your clearly moved goalpost. Yes if the US government wants your messages they will get them. No matter how protected, local and offline your data stored. They have the legal ability to put cameras in your bedroom. That has nothing to do with apple.

How many of you have never been introduced to maladaptive daydreaming or non maladaptive cousin recreational immersive daydreaming?

There is a significant overlap with neurodivergence.

All i can guarantee you is you want your headphones and your bluetooth transmitter to be at least aptx low Latency even better aptx hi-fi. Maybe you already took that for granted but you didn’t mention it so.

Good luck finding a retailer that lists such specification on their bluetooth devices without massively inflating the price. 5 years ago i paid 7 bucks for a great tiny dongle now its 25 and 3 times bigger for same specs…

I had no idea and i thought i was relatively up to date with new gen technology. I thought the foldable phones that came out where more an experimental proof of concept of the first instance of such technology but not that whole flexible panels where possible.

Even just the fact an oled display can be this thin is completely new to me.

Good luck with overpriced shipping :) but still for something i though was not yet possible its shockingly accessible.

Found them on amazon holy shit.

You’d think something like this would be major tech news, people have been talking about this tech for ages and a consensus for many is that it wasn’t impossible. (Look at all the crap foldable phones)

It’s objectively not cheap but it’s not expensive for such revolutionary tech.

So the question isn’t if ordinary people can exert copyright over their content, they absolutely can.

The reason people seem unaware of this is because the crux is that other then a rare exception no ordinary person can sue a megaorg like google or meta and win. For mostly trying to find a literal army of lawyers and corrupt bureaucrats would be mental health suicide.

That’s exactly how capitalism likes it and thats how they stay on top in a position to lobby lawmakers, which is yet another thing you are definitely legally allowed to do as an individual.

Destroying items is destruction of property, usually that is a crime but its farm from terrorism. Unless you really believe that ceo’s are cowering under their beds in fear because first a gaspump, second must be storming their private islands with guns?

Just like with other laws there are exceptions where something does and does not count as a crime.

Accidentally killing a home invader in self defense isn’t murder either.

Obviously i dont know what truly goes on in any judges head but considering that industrialist have been actively involved in covering up how much environmental damage they have actually done to populated areas. (Exploit underground water during times of drought causing cracks and collapses in hundreds of familie homes to give you a single example of something i know happens)

If one considers that i believe there is a good argument agains dismantling the tools of oil companies in the name of self defense.

Industries should not pretend to feel terrorizes by some ecologists and climate conscious youth. The people are getting terrorizing by systemic exploitation of commons for nothing but the greed of a few for ages.

Without additional information that seems more likely but its at least portrayed here as a real display.

It would still be a very interesting idea to rather make everything a display make everything a zero energy AR surface but then we need convenient mainstream AR wearables.

This channel has been uploaded vids of these screens for 8 months now. Is there some more tangible info on how these came about?

I don’t think you can diy this in a garage?

Controversial for who? The left has been calling him out for fascism since the start and the right loves him for that exact reason.

The fact that a hitler wannabe has an actual shot at becoming president, has been president is the controversial part.

Well said!