Accessibility, what would the perfect blind Linux Desktop be like for you? - Feddit
feddit.de
Accessibility is a really important field. Everyone should have the right to use a free and friendly Operating System. But its a pretty nieche topic, and I also think current ways of implementing it are not perfect. I created a Thread on Fedora Discussion (Link) but Lemmy is way more active so I would love to spread attention to this topic, and collect your ideas. - How should a blind Desktop be structured? - Are there any big dealbreakers like Wayland, TTS engines, specific applications e.g.? - What do you think would be the best base Desktop to build such a setup on? - Would you think an immutable, out of the box Distro like “Fedora Silversound”, with everything included, the best tools, presets, easy setup e.g. is a good idea? - How privacy-friendly can a usable blind Desktop be? Also, how would you like to call it? “A Talking Desktop”? I am excited for your comments!

I am very curious and want to help to make Linux more accessible.

I wrote with some people and got some insights:

  • everything text, like a read-mode-only browser or a plain Terminal is best for TTS engines.
  • TTS engines are difficult, some are really good but need many resources, some are worse but save resources
  • TTS needs to be optimized to be really fast in some cases, to keep up with the speed
  • some apps are better, some are worse, but probably most apps dont really suit blind people, as the whole GUI concept makes no sense

I am really curious. How would it be best for you, braille vs. voice, voice input vs braille vs. gestures?

What apps do you find best, how do you browse the web, find media to listen, how do you use Document editors and what purpose do they have for you?

Thanks a lot!

  • MostlyBlindGamerMAEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    Ah, that time I magnified the screen with my phone to get my NAS back up. Conversely, that time I did unspeakable things to my Mac and got it restored just fine.

    Yeah, it’s not about the specific issues, it’s about assumptions and lack of out-of-the-box accessibility.

    • Illecors@lemmy.cafeEnglish
      21·
      1 year ago

      Fair points. All I can say is that Linux was built in a way to be commanded. It makes no assumptions, fails on error. In general that’s an amazing thing and really what majes it great, but I appreciate the fact it gets in a way of accessibility specifically.

      • Samuel ProulxMAEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        But it does make assumptions. It assumes I can see the monitor and read printed text. I’d have no problem with it failing on error, if that failure always made sound. There are BIOS firmwares that can play mp3 files, and DOS could make noise via the PC speaker, for God’s sake. There’s no excuse for Linux’s ableist assumptions.

        • Illecors@lemmy.cafeEnglish
          11·
          1 year ago

          I’ll stick to what I said before - it doesn’t. You can command it to make noise, but it has to be an active decision.

          • Samuel ProulxMAEnglish
            31·
            1 year ago

            But you don’t have to command it to print text on the screen. That doesn’t need to be an active decision. Your assumptions are still showing.