• SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem with sin tax is that they just demonize a new behavior or product whenever they want to raise taxes. It becomes a financial burden to be yourself, depending on the whims of society.

    • theinspectorst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No. Pigouvian taxes are about putting a price on the social cost of antisocial activities - pollution, congestion, etc.

      If I close and seal all my doors and windows and then choose to pump CO2 and other harmful gases into my house, the cost of doing this is largely going to fall on me, and I can probably be trusted to be sensible about how much of this I do. But in the real world, there is no natural mechanism to force me to internalise the costs to the rest of you of pumping out carbon emissions into the atmosphere.

      It’s nothing to do with ‘sin’. Pigouvian taxes are about putting the societal price on antisocial behaviour so market forces can function.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that they change the topics to tax more behaviors. It starts out as a carbon tax on big trucks, then they add a tobacco tax, then a vape tax, then an alcohol tax, then a bar tax, then a restaurant tax, then a soda tax, then a streaming video tax… Whenever they want more money they demonize a new behavior.