Ok I think I do know the answer but I never learned it, so I want to learn it today. It’s been about 1 year now we can reliably make 3nm chips, which is impressive on a scale of size. But why is is better? My theory is simply: We can make a product the same size but add more on it because it’s smaller, making it stronger and faster for more complex operations. Which would mean it’s not the chip that’s impressive on its own, just the size of it.

Or there is something else, and I’d love to get the full explanation and understand chips better

  • Sabata11792@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought the big hold back for this size was the shenanigans around quantum tunneling messing up data in the CPU. How is that accounted for?

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      IIRC, anything less than 7-10nm is mostly marketing-speak anyway. Tunneling is a real limit at that scale, but chipmakers keep advertising smaller numbers as a performance-class figure rather than a physical size.