• superkret@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only ones who have to be concerned about the looks are the instance admins.
      Lemmy isn’t a product in need of marketing.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right, but this is the sort of thing that gets blown up by the media and used to shut down privacy-friendly platforms.

        Maybe it’s a slippery slope fallacy on my part, but it’s not unimaginable to consider the idea that legislators could try to take down an enitre platform based on something like this. Just look at some of the proposed privacy-antagonistic legislation that’s been introduced recently to see what I mean.

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many Lemmy users wish their niche communities would become more populated. For goals like that, the reputation of the platform is important. I also don’t want to get into defensive debates when revealing to someone that I use Lemmy.

      • hypelightfly@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have been told, the tankies that run it don’t care because the people who don’t like pedophiles called them out.