On the contrary, it would take a lot to stretch my credulity with how little people understand security and how much they love convenience.
You’re probably right about fax. Telecom infrastructure in the US is notoriously insecure, as demonstrated by Salt Typhoon, and the only reason there has been little regulatory pressure to secure it is that the NSA et al love how easy it is to spy on us.
I almost wonder whether these regulations exist not to protect data, but to lull the public into a sense of complacency. Perhaps that’s a tad conspiratorial, but so many laws exist to make legislators look good rather than serve their purported raison d’etre - just look at that OS-based age verification nonsense. At the very least, the national security state has a use for such things, regardless.
Fwiw, I got my first physical tinfoil hat from a friend warning about the debt crisis the USA was creating a year or so before “too big to fail.” I got a few e-tinfoil hats in the preceding decades.
Conspiracy hypotheses aren’t necessarily bad, although plenty certainly are. It’s just another term to silence dissidents.
Oh, for sure, but I do like to qualify my statements when I’m speculating without evidence. It is wild, though, once the you start seeing how much reality doesn’t align with the endorsed narrative.
You wouldn’t believe things I have seen in various industries that are supposedly “fiercely protected by federal regulation.”
https://www.onetimefax.com/blog/how-secure-are-faxes/
As an example, I doubt traditional fax to be secure…at all, and you really wouldn’t believe stuff I’ve seen texted and hot/y/gmailed.
On the contrary, it would take a lot to stretch my credulity with how little people understand security and how much they love convenience.
You’re probably right about fax. Telecom infrastructure in the US is notoriously insecure, as demonstrated by Salt Typhoon, and the only reason there has been little regulatory pressure to secure it is that the NSA et al love how easy it is to spy on us.
My b. I’ve seen a lot and every time I think I’ve seen it all, I witness new security/federally protected data nightmares.
I almost wonder whether these regulations exist not to protect data, but to lull the public into a sense of complacency. Perhaps that’s a tad conspiratorial, but so many laws exist to make legislators look good rather than serve their purported raison d’etre - just look at that OS-based age verification nonsense. At the very least, the national security state has a use for such things, regardless.
Fwiw, I got my first physical tinfoil hat from a friend warning about the debt crisis the USA was creating a year or so before “too big to fail.” I got a few e-tinfoil hats in the preceding decades.
Conspiracy hypotheses aren’t necessarily bad, although plenty certainly are. It’s just another term to silence dissidents.
Oh, for sure, but I do like to qualify my statements when I’m speculating without evidence. It is wild, though, once the you start seeing how much reality doesn’t align with the endorsed narrative.
You got that right!