• Alxe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is called economic model and it is a societal contract. For better or worse, capitalism democratised consumption and largely improved the lifelihood of many.

    I’m all for UBI, but it is too idealistic to have this without a world-disrupting event like a Great War or similar.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Or the arrival or AI? A global pandemic which prevented working together?

      GDPs where the median and average are constantly drifting apart? The creation of a cabal of billionaires who manipulate the masses and get caught. The rise of trillion dolllar companies, where it is difficult to function in society without using their products or services.

      The world events have happened. Edit: so many typos.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Obviously those things weren’t disruptive enough to usher in the changes you’re hoping for, since they didn’t happen.

        I guess we’ll have to wait until even more people are food insecure to see what happens.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I think part of the problem is more people are food insecure but not as desperate. More of a slow burn struggle. Which keeps them occupied.

          Or the wealthy in control have learned better how to manage brrqd and circus with police control to prevent change.