Sidetrack Opponents with Name-Calling and Ridicule ~ This is also known as the primary ‘attack the messenger’ ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as ‘kooks’, ‘right-wing’, ‘liberal’, ‘left-wing’, ‘terrorists’, ‘conspiracy buffs’, ‘radicals’, ‘militia’, ‘racists’, ‘religious fanatics’, ‘sexual deviates’, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
17. Change the Subject ~ Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can ‘argue’ with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
“Its a war bro, like Iraq”
“Its a genocide and massacre bro, look Bucha satellite photos, do not talk about how they got debunked”
“Bro Russia lowkey dropped nukes like Chernobyl”
- average C14, Right Sektor, Azov supporter liberal and knows only what Western MIC MSM tells
What random sentence generator did you use?
The one that you did not, a functional, critical brain. Liberals can only be revolutionaries in internet downvoting.
Good thing I’m not a liberal.
Certainly looks like it, no matter how hard you try. Downvoting is really getting to me, I am seething! Look!!
25 Rules of Disinformation
So, who started with the implied lies, conflating Russia’s op in Ukraine with USA’s genocide and destruction in Iraq?