• vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        it is now provably not secure. Because pos is provably not objective. Making the whole thing moot. Also, it is literally a system explicitly designed around “the rich get richer”.

            • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Even if it is (I don’t see your reasoning explaining that) that doesn’t mean the resulting security scheme is objective.

      • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Isn’t ethereum a centralised shit coin with a money printer attached, controlled by the owners of the “foundation?”

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          In what way is Ethereum centralized?
          The owers of ETH contribute to the consensus.
          How would the foundation control any of that?
          Mybe you confuse Ethereum with IOTA?