Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • corbin@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    How about users make decisions for themselves and block Threads if they want?

    • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think the issue here is users data will be on threads server which god knows how it will be used. To train AI? To target ads ? Nobody knows so better everyone block threads and keep internet safe as these companies have destroyed internet.

        • Retrograde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Indexing by search engines and what Meta harvests are astronomically different - I fail to see your point.

          • corbin@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            If I am on Mastodon, there is nothing that Threads can collect from me that they can not get already. My posts are public, Meta or anyone else doesn’t need permission to look at them.

            The only risk is if I am sending direct messages to someone on Threads from Mastodon, then obviously Meta has a copy. ActivityPub is not E2E encrypted, you shouldn’t be using it for private communication at all, the threat model is the same between Threads and any other Mastodon server.

            • Retrograde@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Alright, fair enough, but why would anyone allow meta even an inch of space into a ‘free’ platform? Have you seen the numerous ( and to be fair, much better articulated) comments on this very thread concerning “EEE”? Don’t you think it’s alarming how many people support Meta joining?

              I’m thinking of it from a grand scale: Folks in this thread are essentially saying “awe, c’mon, it’s probably okay if Zuck’s mega-corp puts it’s foot in the door of a burgeoning federated forum community; what could go wrong?”

              Hey- let’s talk in five years and see what happens- yeah?

              • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Alright, fair enough, but why would anyone allow meta even an inch of space into a ‘free’ platform?

                It’s an open protocol, they can join if they want. That’s kinda the point of being an open protocol, anyone willing to implement it just can.

                I imagine that if tomorrow Meta decides to run a free email service ala Hotmail or Gmail you’d be demanding that they will destroy email everywhere if they aren’t put on every black hole list immediately?