The new edition of the survey is up until August 31. Community members should consider taking the survey to help inform decisions in accessibility guidelines and in practice.

After taking it, let’s come back to this post to discuss. Which questions were more relevant to you? Which ones should they have added?

  • MostlyBlindGamerOPMA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This one felt pretty short to me.

    I appreciate the question about disability so we get less cross-contamination between use by disabled people and developers or auditors: the objectives are different and so are the usage patterns and needs.

    The question about AI was also pretty nuanced. This might be one of the best editions of the survey.

  • NV Access
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s always tricky to get questions like this right for everyone - particularly where people may be coming from completely different places like end users with disabilities - or sighted developers testing for accessibility - but where they may also overlap (a blind developer who uses a screen reader themselves but ALSO tests for accessibility with it. We find the same thing with the yearly NVDA satisfaction survey we run. So credit to WebAIM for their efforts with this survey :)

    • MostlyBlindGamerOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Absolutely. Study design is hard, but improvements show genuine interest.