I’ll go first. I wish Lemmy communities existed for: destroyed tanks. Ukraine War video report. sopranos duckposting. benzodiazepines.

I will comment more as I think of them.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    37·
    8 days ago

    I just want the communities that already exist to have more engagement. It’s pretty demoralizing making a high-effort post and getting only a handful of upvotes and no comments. And it’s like watching a hospice patient visiting a neat-sounding community and realizing all the posts are by the single moderator (and are getting less and less frequent).

    I think one of the best ways for folks to contribute to the health of Lemmy would be for everyone to spend some time on “all - new” (or even “all - top hour”) on occasion. “New” on Lemmy is not the cesspool of reposts and garbage that it was on Reddit (although there is a LOT of porn if you don’t have NSFW toggled off), and the quality of the first few pages of “top hour” is usually pretty good (except again for the porn, which it turns out gets pretty decent engagement). I visit “top hour” pretty regularly, and nearly all posts that are stuck in zero-engagement/minimal-engagement pergatory are simply niche content rather than bad content.

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      2·
      7 days ago

      visiting a neat-sounding community and realizing all the posts are by the single moderator (and are getting less and less frequent).

      This will be a key moment towards Lemmy’s growth or decline. Especially in non-tech/meme/politics communities, it’s so easy for the only poster be a single person who is posting daily, and who then simply runs out of content. Maybe the solution is for each frequent poster to post non-daily on several different communities. Anyway, check out !fedigrow@lemm.ee, @Blaze@reddthat.com has started posting a weekly thread on “How is your niche community doing?”

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      15·
      8 days ago

      We added the scaled sort to help with that(it gives a boost to less active communities), but I don’t know if many people are using it.

      • pyrflie@lemm.ee
        2·
        7 days ago

        Hot and Scaled are my main sorts. I alternate a couple of times a day. They get me the most interesting content.

        I only check the first 3 pages of Active twice per day.

        Edit: New is once per week and I generally regret it.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        3·
        8 days ago

        I think one other thing that might help would be to adjust the “Active” sort. I believe it has some kind of hard-coded 2 day limit? So posts older than 2 days will not show up. The problem is that as the sort is working right now, it often displays posts that are 2 days old. This isn’t great for getting new content. It’d be nice if the “Active” sort (or any other other sorts) parameters could be configured somehow.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          2·
          7 days ago

          The active, hot, and scaled sort have that two day bump limit, but active uses the newest comment time for it’s algorithm, whereas hot uses the post creation time.

          So the hot sort is better for new trending content, and active is better for topics with new comments.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            2·
            7 days ago

            active uses the newest comment time

            I think this is what I don’t like about active sort. Just a single comment is all it needs to bump a highly upvoted post to the top. I feel like it should rather look at an aggregate of recent comments or something along those lines, so that a single comment doesn’t cause such a big effect. It’s kinda like if a single vote could move a post to the top.