cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/23066599

Since 2017, Wikipedia editors have compiled a list of news sources from which articles are highly likely to employ systematic bias, lack professional editing and/or journalistic standards, regularly misrepresent sources, and/or fabricate information.

While its list is by no means a complete list of publications with the aforementioned problems, it has helped make Wikipedia articles more reliable by basing them off of sources covering the same events and information from a less biased point of view.

To make Lemmy news communities better than their Reddit counterparts, I think avoiding links to those sources in favor of more reliable alternatives would be worthwhile.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Thanks for this.

    FYI: The Tesseract UI puts MBFC badges on posts with their bias/credbility ratings and provides a short report and link to the full report on their site.

    I wonder how hard it would be to pull this list into a JSON file to use as an additional reference?

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thanks to your support in sharing this method, it is being employed by the moderation team. A bot scans for new posts and notifies the mods if there is a low credibility rating. We do not currently use bots to take any direct action on this basis.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        A bot scans for new posts and notifies the mods if there is a low credibility rating.

        Could it leave a comment visible to the general community on the article in question alerting the rest of us to low credibility sources?