Archive link

President Biden said in an interview released on Wednesday that he would re-evaluate whether to stay in the presidential race if a doctor told him directly that he had a medical condition that made that necessary.

Mr. Biden has said repeatedly that none of his doctors have told him he has a serious medical condition. Dr. Kevin O’Connor, the White House physician, wrote after the president’s physical in February that Mr. Biden is “a healthy, active, robust, 81-year-old male who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the presidency.”

But his disastrous performance at a debate with former President Donald J. Trump last month, which prompted a wave of calls by Democratic allies to step aside, raised questions about his health and acuity.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Party leaders and mega donors seem to have coalesced around Harris. So if it happens it’ll be quick. I sincerely hope he’s actually healthy and this is a managed exit.

    • Rutty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I sure hope not. Harris is a sure fire way to a Trump presidency.

      How about Mark Kelly?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mark Kelly isn’t well known outside Arizona. And I dunno about Harris being a loser here. The biggest complaint about Biden is his age. And she solves that.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m impressed you came this far back. We work with what we know when we know it. In hindsight she ran a shit campaign that tried to tell her base they were wrong and get Republicans to switch sides. Shockingly, neither of those are winning strategies.

            • Rutty@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Viewed from a historical perspective, it’s hard to see how the non-incombent didn’t have a really good advantage.

              Hindsight can always be 20/20, and think a Buttigieg/Kelly ticket would have done a bit better. Buttigieg has been in charge of infrastructure, which I believe has been well run. He’s from the rust belt, and is more familiar with the working class vs the candidate with California Progressive with a DA background.

              Ultimately though, I think the fault lies with the Democratic Party hijacking the primary process.