Net-zero emission goals went out the window with AI.

  • Bob Robertson IX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We need municipal datacenters that can be integrated into the municipal water departments, and municipal electrical grid. Use the hot water to provide ‘on tap’ hot water for local businesses that need it.

  • Affidavit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Huh. I run a LLM locally on my own machine. Not looking forward to my next water bill.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Have you checked your computer’s gallons per hour? I’m thinking of getting an electric myself.

  • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Wait… What? The article seems to imply that the water is consumed, but it’s referencing the water used in cooling loops.

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Data centers don’t have “water cooling loops” that are anything like the ones in consumer PCs. To maximize cooling capacity, a lot of the systems use some sort of evaporative cooling that results in some of the water just floating away into the atmosphere (after which point it would need to be purified again before it could be used for human consumption)

      It also seems from what I can find like some data centers just pipe in clean ambient-temperature water, use it to cool the servers, and then pipe it right back out into the municipal sewer system. Which is even more stupid, because you’re taking potable water, sending it through systems that should be pretty clean, and then mixing it with waste water. If anything, that should be considered “gray water”, which is still fine to use for things like flushing toilets.

      • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I would be really surprised if anyone is cooling data centres with city water except in emergency, that’s so unbelievably expensive (could see water direct from a lake though but that had it’s own issues too). I recall saving millions just by adjusting a fill target on an evaporative cooling tower so it wouldn’t overfill (levels were really cyclic, targets weren’t tuned for them), and that was only a fraction of what it’d have cost if we’d’ve used pure city.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is correct. You don’t need potable water for cooling systems. Releasing vapor returns natural water where it came from, without adding any more heat to the environment than you already were.

          The environmental cost of AI needs to be measured in gigawatt hours, distributed over different energy generation methods.

          Adding heat to the system isn’t a big deal if you’re powered by solar energy, for example.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        As with everything else, we need the government to regulate it because otherwise the corporations don’t really give a shit.

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    In this world, we obey the law of thermodynamics. I’d love to know how this 3 bottles of water is “consumed”. Because more than likely, the water is simply being used for cooling, which doesn’t consume it at all, it just makes it warmer.

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It consumes the resource of “purified, available water” which is consumed as it is no longer purified or unavailable (if evaporated). The same way nothing ever “consumes” energy, it just makes it unusable.

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah the article is disingenuous at best. There are many things wrong with generative AI, but this is just a lousy approach.

      If I make a PC, put in a water cooling loop, and use it to run an LLM - sure, water is circulating, but that water isn’t just vanishing lol.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My friend, you are naive at best if you think AI data centers are using closed loop water cooling. Look up evaporative cooling towers. It’s “consumed” in the sense that it is evaporated.

        • Zikeji@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I specifically avoided saying they did because I wasn’t knowledgeable on the topic. But I agree, I could equally be accused of being disingenuous by phrasing it in a way that could lead people to assume they use closed loops.

          I did look those up, and while evaporation cooling isn’t the only method used, it also doesn’t evaporate all the water each pass, only a portion of it (granted “a portion” is all I found at a quick look, which isn’t actually useful).

          I do agree though, the water usage is excessive, and when though that water only “changes forms”, it’s still removes it from a water source and only some of it may make its way back in.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The water simply vanishes, consumed by the AI’s ever growing need for H Y D R A T I O N. /s

  • ninjabard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s almost like these “services” are an unnecessary blight that benefit only those that profit financially from them.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      that, is what a service always was and will continue to be, live service games, service jobs, telco service. this isn’t new, it just affects more people