• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Once you factor in things it mentions like insurance, taxes, upkeep along with others like a down payment then it’s very easy to see where the 14% numbers comes from.

    So you’re agreeing with me that they’re only comparing the first month of ownership of the house with the last month of renting? There’s no factoring in the long term rise in rents to their math?

    There’s a lot of additional and hidden costs with home ownership.

    There certainly are, but its very situational. A 100 year old home will have very different upkeep costs than a 10 year old home. A home in a hurricane zone will have different upkeep than one that isn’t.

    • Sundial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I mean neither of us know how they arrived at the 14% number. So your comparison is not really relevant and I would say it’s not a good one even. But in a generic/average month-to-month overview, home ownership is almost always more expensive.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I had a long reply typed out exploring the various aspects and raising questions to the methodology and applicability of the advice in the article to different groups of people in different geographies and stage of life. However the tone of replies seems to just want to accept the article as is. Its a yahoo finance article, so the depth is pretty shallow and only speaks in broad generalizations. Your reply is doubling down on exactly that. There’s nothing wrong with that per se, but it looks like the there isn’t a desire in this thread to explore it any further.

        So we’ll just accept the article answer which you summarize well: “generic/average month-to-month overview, home ownership is almost always more expensive.”

        Conventional wisdom says keep renting folks and don’t question it.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Did you not read the comment? Property tax, insurance, and upkeep are all perpetual costs. The down-payment, closing fees, and potential mortgage insurance are the only up-front costs.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Did you not read the comment? Property tax, insurance, and upkeep are all perpetual costs. The down-payment, closing fees, and potential mortgage insurance are the only up-front costs.

        I read the comment. It doesn’t address the question. “Over what period of time?”

        Are they judging on owing a house for 30 years vs renting for 30 years or are they judging owning house for 1 year vs renting for 1 year?