• huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What’s the point of having data split over different colours/coasts? Rather had more info on the circles’ sizes, but ok

    Edit: should have added a thank you note for op, because sounds like I critize them but I’m not

  • Emotional_Series7814@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, it is pretty to look at. Wonder if the diagram is confusing or if I’m just dumb, because it took me a bit to figure out that circle size corresponded with millimeters. That’s the struggle of knowing 1) you’re not an omniscient genius but also 2) data can be presented in a way that’s confusing to most people, but not being a design expert so you don’t know if you’re just dumb or if it’s a design flaw. And you don’t want to start criticizing stuff when you are not an expert and saying something blatantly wrong, so you just wonder and maybe type out this paragraph online.

    • huppakee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Following this community really confirms my believe that data visualization is a trade that’s not easily mastered. Making it easy to read but not pretty is almost as easy as making it pretty but not very insightful. Making it easy to understand, meaningful and also pretty to look at is incredibly difficult.

  • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is the reason for the East/West coast disparity the tectonic plates? I imagine (at least along the Juan de Fuca subduction zone) that the interaction makes the terrain more rugged compared to the geologically more stable Atlantic coast.

  • MelonYellow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunate that the low-lying areas (the Gulf and Eastern Seaboard) that would be most affected are the ones that have the biggest change.