You can use whatever license you want. You can even go ahead and write your own license from scratch.

You’d only have to worry about enforcing the license, especially when you include such unorthodox terms and conditions.

Congrats on the release!

How is lemmy-ui-leptos coming along? Curious to know when it might be ready for primetime.

What’s bad about IPv6?

The fact that this is the top comment sends a funny message about the Lemmy community as a whole.

☝️ This user has never donated to libre software.

A sample size of 1 isn’t really meaningful.

Also, this post is refuting a claim that isn’t really being made? At least not literally.

How are they ditching LoL on Linux if they’ve never officially supported it in the first place?

Lemmy users will cancel this for not being hardwired to defederate with Threads :^)

It’s already illegal if your content is large enough to be copyrightable.

Well, in that case you should never publish your code anywhere.

The issue is that the majority of people on the Fediverse are “techies” with specific interests, which skews the spectrum of content quite a bit.

The Fediverse is in an awkward spot. It needs more people like you to keep technology communities from becoming Linux circlejerks, but at the same time those circlejerks are driving people like you out.

Didn’t take long for instancism to become a thing here, huh

Do you think comments like these are swaying public opinion in your favor?

People will never use downvotes the intended way. They haven’t done so on Reddit either.

I see no productive use for downvotes, so I’ve disabled them.

But what if some of my comments include information that can uniquely identify me?

That can be something like “message me on Matrix at …”

I didn’t see your initial proposal. However I sympathise with this post and I really understand the frustration you’re feeling with the lack of donations, having seen it time and time again in the open-source space.

I was going to pledge that I’d donate once I had the cash available, but seeing how you respond to people in the comments is leading me to reconsider. You may not be demanding donations, but to me it does look like you’re attempting to shame people into donating with a challenging tone. Quoting one of your responses:

Anyway, now you know it as well. If you think that this is a worthy effort, what are you going to do about it besides commenting here?

I still want to support you if you’re going to pursue this, since I myself have a strong interest in Lemmy being GDPR-compliant, but I ask you that you please reconsider how you approach the people that can potentially be supporters of your efforts.

Can you show where the GDPR excludes public information? Because if it doesn’t and can uniquely identify a person, then it’s still subject to this regulation.

IANAL, but fediverse instances need to find a way to automatically set up data processing agreements when initializing federation to be GDPR-compliant: https://gdpr.eu/what-is-data-processing-agreement/

I’m confused. I opened the first 6 issues featured in your lemmy-ui link and you closed them all yourself?

Why did you list “privacy”?