The end goal of this proposal is to build interoperability features into GitLab so that it’s possible on one instance of GitLab to open a merge request to a project hosted on an other instance, merging all willing instances in a global network.

To achieve that, we propose to use ActivityPub, the w3c standard used by the Fediverse. This will allow us to build upon a robust and battle-tested protocol, and it will open GitLab to a wider community.

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Being able to create issues and discuss merge requests on various source hosting sites without having to create an account on each would be a huge step forward! Especially since M$ has taken over Github and is well on its way to become the defacto centralized Git hoster.

    • density@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      well on its way to become the defacto centralized Git hoster.

      If this isn’t Github already, what is?

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hold on, are we trying to decentralize an intentionally-centralized point for an already decentralized source versioning system? 😅

    • Kayn@dormi.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not quite.

      A project’s repo would still be in one centralized location, like gitlab.com. But you’d no longer need an account on gitlab.com to make a pull request.

      • dsemy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        He’s saying Git is already decentralized, GitLab isn’t.

        A project using mailing lists for development can already receive patches from (pretty much) any mail server (while still having a central Git repo).

        It’s kinda surprising it took this long for this to come to Git “forges” TBH.