• 13 Posts
  • 886 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle




  • Why do they continue to publish articles literally stating the same facts, word for word, from those old, published position statements?

    The science hasn’t changed. In fact, it’s only supported plant-based diets over the years.

    If you talk to a registered dietitian today, they will say the same thing. At least, that’s been my experience through working with several over the years.

    Either way, it doesn’t particularly matter to me. I’ve been vegan for over two decades and my doctor is quite happy with my health.


  • They did not retract or change their position, though.

    And they still publish information based on the same wording and conclusions they had when they did publish a position.

    I’m not sure what’s so confusing about this. They did not change their position on plant-based diets, and I believe because it would be redundant to keep saying what the science has confirmed year after year.

    Is there any position they continually confirm year after year? If so, I’d be really surprised, unless the science isn’t supporting their position, so they have to give their reasons for still having them.

    The only article I linked was reviewed by their people just a few weeks ago, so it’s as current as you could expect.


  • It’s not that they no longer support the idea of a plant-based diet, it’s more likely that plant-based diets are so overwhelmingly supported by the evidence that they no longer have to keep saying it out loud.

    Especially since their recent articles seem to echo what their position paper on vegetarian diets already said years ago. To them, it’s like common knowledge.

    That said, they are one of dozens of dietetic and health authorities around the world who have made it clear that a plant-based diet can not only be appropriate for all life stages, but it can be used to reverse certain diseases (i.e heart disease and T2 diabetes) when other diets simply can’t compare.









  • There are loads of other benefits that come along with eating plants, but regarding protein source:

    “Conclusions Higher intake of total protein was associated with a lower risk of all cause mortality, and intake of plant protein was associated with a lower risk of all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Replacement of foods high in animal protein with plant protein sources could be associated with longevity.SOURCE

    “Conclusions and relevance: High animal protein intake was positively associated with cardiovascular mortality and high plant protein intake was inversely associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, especially among individuals with at least 1 lifestyle risk factor. Substitution of plant protein for animal protein, especially that from processed red meat, was associated with lower mortality, suggesting the importance of protein source.SOURCE






  • If you’re on the sidewalk in public, you have no expectation of privacy.

    Under normal context, that’s correct.

    But if you are purposely being filmed as part of a movie, project, “prank” or anything else that makes you the “talent”, it moves into a commercial licensing/permit/consent realm.

    I’ve been to loads of public events where I’ve had to sign a release form acknowledging that my photo may be captured and that those images may be used in marketing/social media posts, etc. That’s because being at the event makes me the subject. While this wouldn’t be a concern if other people in the group are taking photos/video for their own personal use, the fact that those images may be used for commercial purposes changes the context.

    If social media asshats want to use someone’s photos or video for their own commercial purposes, they should be following the same rules as any other professional.

    For clarity, we aren’t talking about randos being filmed while on a walking tour of a city; we’re talking about specific people being targeted and recorded as the main subject without consent and with the explicit purpose to use their video for commercial content.

    Nearly every country has laws protecting people from having their images used for commercial purposes without consent.