• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2025

help-circle



  • kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldtoAutism@lemmy.worldExactly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    No need to take it personally if this is obviously not about you. My comment is about people who try to find reasons to not put in effort. Then you clearly state that you are quite the opposite. Do you think that your stance is general? Do you really not know the type of people I am writing about?


  • kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldtoAutism@lemmy.worldExactly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    I am all in for people to start their treatment according to such a diagnosis if it “works wonders”. What I fear is that an era is coming where people in mass will selfdiagnose this and that and then have a reason to not put in effort. I have already seen this in university in action.


  • Light conservativism, open to gays, business and economy centered, nationalistic but not white nationalism and hating moscow. They think their biggest task is to heal the wounds that made Hungarians enemies of themselves (which is kinda is the biggest task). So overall quite broad, populist points. This was the best we could do after 16 years of protonazism.


  • For a longterm relationship to really work, in my experience of 7 years, you must sometimes fight with the person you love as well. It is not the most important thing and in mass much more attention and sacrifice is needed than fighting. But even the other person will appreciate it, if you will fight them a bit, when you feel they temporaly abandoned the relationship or common goals. If you truly love someone, then you hope you will not need to fight them, but you are also ready to do it, for them, for the relationship. Anyway that is my two cents.













  • There is Sudan, there is Cambodia, there was Pol Pot and China and Vietnam fighting. There is China’s purge on muslims (which is self proclaimed to be atheist and marxist). Marxism can be used (when twisted enough) to justify horrible things. Many people thus conclude that marxism is bad (the opium of masses a quote from Marx on religion). Do the reactionary logic concluding that marxism is bad because of Stalin and Pol Pot fail? I do think so.

    One of the persons I listed, Béla Tábor, a Hungarian philosopher claims that the original Christian faith of Europe disintegrated into revolution (Marx) and religion and that at the time (1945) revolution was the purer one of the two antipodes. There can be place for arguments measuring the role and purity of religion in the 21st century. But categorical arguments have nonintended consequences: marxism, religion and science were all twisted for bad aims. Claiming that religion is inherently bad is the same take as claiming marxism is inherently bad. I am critical towards science, religion and marxism. But my critique is an inner critique. Compared to nazism (or bolshevism): I am opposed to nazism alltogether without claiming that there is pure forces of freedom hidden in it. I do not see how could one make categorical bad judgement about religion (or marxism) akin to judgement about nazism without essentially lying.

    The same author, Béla Tábor, a jewish thinker, if alive, would claim that the biggest actor of antisemitism today is the state of Israel itself. He would claim it from a deeply religious point. A point that is so religious that it opposes nationalism radically, very different from the shitshow going down in Israel or the US.