- 0 Posts
- 22 Comments
No need to take it personally if this is obviously not about you. My comment is about people who try to find reasons to not put in effort. Then you clearly state that you are quite the opposite. Do you think that your stance is general? Do you really not know the type of people I am writing about?
I am all in for people to start their treatment according to such a diagnosis if it “works wonders”. What I fear is that an era is coming where people in mass will selfdiagnose this and that and then have a reason to not put in effort. I have already seen this in university in action.
Light conservativism, open to gays, business and economy centered, nationalistic but not white nationalism and hating moscow. They think their biggest task is to heal the wounds that made Hungarians enemies of themselves (which is kinda is the biggest task). So overall quite broad, populist points. This was the best we could do after 16 years of protonazism.
For a longterm relationship to really work, in my experience of 7 years, you must sometimes fight with the person you love as well. It is not the most important thing and in mass much more attention and sacrifice is needed than fighting. But even the other person will appreciate it, if you will fight them a bit, when you feel they temporaly abandoned the relationship or common goals. If you truly love someone, then you hope you will not need to fight them, but you are also ready to do it, for them, for the relationship. Anyway that is my two cents.
kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldto
HistoryPhotos@piefed.social•Photo of Budapest, Hungary, 1953
3·3 months agoAlors viens encore une fois, pourquoi pas?
kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldto
HistoryPhotos@piefed.social•Photo of Budapest, Hungary, 1953
7·3 months agoYes, Buda and Pest, where Pest is pronounced Pesht. These were the big ones on either side of the river. Buda on the hillsy side and Pest on the plains side. We Hungarians are also taught of Óbuda which means ancient Buda as the third and smallest city that got merged originally in the 19th century. Then the city swallowed some other cities and villages in the coming century (1950).
kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldtoNPCs (NonPolitical Comics)@piefed.social•Song Break [Port Sherry]
3·3 months agoPublic transport is objectively sexier than car crazyness, but public transport still mashes insects on windshields.
kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldtoNPCs (NonPolitical Comics)@piefed.social•Song Break [Port Sherry]
12·3 months agoAnd what animals are ok to have them die then? Are pesticides ok? Smashing insects on a windshield? Eating a spider while you sleep?
Bojler eladó
This funny if they were talking to a guy and even funnier if they were talking to a wrought gate.
kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldto
World News@lemmy.world•Putin doubles down on demands for Ukrainian territory ahead of talks with USEnglish
153·5 months agoFuck you. All the Russian speaking Ukrainians and even the Russians themselves are suffering because of Putin’s clearly imperialist war that are based on lies and here you are spitting those lies. If you do not want to lie, then write that Ukraine is in a dire position. That is true. The rest is cheap fucking lies. Fuck you.
Canon is still not god’s word. At least not in christianity and judaism. Its still peoples’ words except for a few sentences of the old testament or except for when Jesus is speaking in the gospels (who is still not the Father). Islam might be different.
kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldto
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal [Moved to discuss.online]@midwest.social•Fish (2025-11-08)
1·6 months agodeleted by creator
Stating ideologically that you must not kill animals will lead to absurdity as well. (The post is about the absurdity that does come from ideologically negating the questions of veganism.)
kek_kecske_31@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•She's a pain in my rear but she keeps me straight!
28·7 months agoThe bonmot is attributed to Socrates even though he says it in a Plato dialouge.
There is Sudan, there is Cambodia, there was Pol Pot and China and Vietnam fighting. There is China’s purge on muslims (which is self proclaimed to be atheist and marxist). Marxism can be used (when twisted enough) to justify horrible things. Many people thus conclude that marxism is bad (the opium of masses a quote from Marx on religion). Do the reactionary logic concluding that marxism is bad because of Stalin and Pol Pot fail? I do think so.
One of the persons I listed, Béla Tábor, a Hungarian philosopher claims that the original Christian faith of Europe disintegrated into revolution (Marx) and religion and that at the time (1945) revolution was the purer one of the two antipodes. There can be place for arguments measuring the role and purity of religion in the 21st century. But categorical arguments have nonintended consequences: marxism, religion and science were all twisted for bad aims. Claiming that religion is inherently bad is the same take as claiming marxism is inherently bad. I am critical towards science, religion and marxism. But my critique is an inner critique. Compared to nazism (or bolshevism): I am opposed to nazism alltogether without claiming that there is pure forces of freedom hidden in it. I do not see how could one make categorical bad judgement about religion (or marxism) akin to judgement about nazism without essentially lying.
The same author, Béla Tábor, a jewish thinker, if alive, would claim that the biggest actor of antisemitism today is the state of Israel itself. He would claim it from a deeply religious point. A point that is so religious that it opposes nationalism radically, very different from the shitshow going down in Israel or the US.







Bojler eladó