Others have answered, but the reason why “states’ rights” don’t matter at the Federal level is the Supremacy Clause. States can be more restrictive than the Federal government, but cannot be more lax/loose. An interesting aside is the states that have legalized marijuana usage, where the Federal government has (as of yet) not cracked down on that. It is within constitutional power to do so, but just hasn’t.
I’m on LibreWolf. What made you switch?
Having a news post buried in the path of “contact us” of an Atlanta field office, maybe?
Apple One+
Music, TV, Games, and 50GB storage for $10/month via Verizon.
I learned my lesson from the early days of covid. Buy that good stuff i bulk as a habit, not as an emergency reaction.
Biden went somewhere on this?
Both of those scenarios still leave a conservative majority. Unless a Dem Senate pulls a McConnell on new nominations.
Well yeah, that’s technically their purpose.
States legalizing it are doing so because the federal government is basically turning a blind eye to the supremacy clause on that topic (for the most part). States always have the right to be more restrictive than the federal government, but when they try to make laws less restrictive, it’s technically not on solid legal ground. That said, laws only matter when they are either enforced, or blindly followed.
They’ll appeal anyways, all the way to SCOTUS. It’s part of their overall strategy.
I wonder if/how many of them will be unwillingly forced to the front lines in Ukraine within a year…
I’ve had sets of LED under-cabinet lights powered on 24/7 for about 14 years. I think one bulb went bad, out of 12.
No it doesn’t. That link is about self-hosting Slack apps, AKA integrations with the Slack platform. It is not about self-hosting the core service.
I always considered atheist to mean “don’t believe at all” ans agnostic as “willing to believe, but won’t live any differently”
That sounds more like HR propaganda to me. Interviews aren’t free, but they are cheap. Paying someone what they are worth, vs. low-balling someone desperate, is fiscally practical.
I’ve gotten to the point where I ask recruiters that hit me up on LinkedIn if the position has a listed salary range. If not, I usually bail right then, unless the job or company is interesting enough to have a conversation. But if they are cagey about salary or benefits, I bail. They are the only reason I’m there, so being cagey about them is a red flag.
I came in here to post Mallrats, so you’re not wrong on that either.
Hm, unemployment collection and/or EEOC action for constructive dismissal, cool. My disability is “unable to work when off the clock”.
I’ve always felt like Trump uses “we” more like the “royal we” as in he’s a monarch, whereas other public figures use “we” to include society.
Just having the video player be the same across all sites is a win, I don’t even need the multi-threading or pre-cache entire video to love this.
Nope, fees just get passed to the customer.