Five@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoSo Much for ‘Learn to Code’web.archive.orgexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkSo Much for ‘Learn to Code’web.archive.orgFive@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEm Adespoton@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIndeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).
minus-squareRickRussell_CA@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-21 year ago Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Umm. Yes.
minus-squaredjango@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoYeah sure, i use Emacs to code. In evil mode. A lot of Emacs users use it to code. Why would you think otherwise?
minus-squaresfera@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year ago Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Sure. Why wouldn’t they?
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year ago Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Not sure if that’s a serious question. Yes. They do. And many use it effectively. I use (neo)vim though because it works for me
Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example?
Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).
Umm. Yes.
No, all the cool kids use Vim.
Yeah sure, i use Emacs to code. In evil mode. A lot of Emacs users use it to code. Why would you think otherwise?
Hell yea we do use emacs!
Sure. Why wouldn’t they?
Not sure if that’s a serious question. Yes. They do. And many use it effectively. I use (neo)vim though because it works for me